IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [salud] Shall we adopt draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-03 as a WG work item?

<Martin.Huelsemann@telekom.de> Mon, 22 November 2010 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Huelsemann@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: salud@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9858A3A69A0 for <salud@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 02:53:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oYrHULqzuJK9 for <salud@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 02:53:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tcmail83.telekom.de (tcmail83.telekom.de [62.225.183.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E33A3A699E for <salud@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 02:53:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from he101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.153]) by tcmail81.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 22 Nov 2010 11:54:17 +0100
Received: from HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.4.176]) by HE101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::e439:4046:12e2:e37%15]) with mapi; Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:54:17 +0100
From: Martin.Huelsemann@telekom.de
To: dworley@avaya.com, salud@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:54:15 +0100
Thread-Topic: [salud] Shall we adopt draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-03 as a WG work item?
Thread-Index: AQHLh1oMcpP69GiPsEath4HT7oi295N9V/mg
Message-ID: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE0201113A4FCA0E@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A32@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A32@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [salud] Shall we adopt draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-03 as a WG work item?
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:53:38 -0000

Yes for adoption.


Regards, Martin



> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: salud-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:salud-bounces@ietf.org]
> Im Auftrag von Worley, Dale R (Dale)
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. November 2010 20:49
> An: salud@ietf.org
> Betreff: [salud] Shall we adopt
> draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-03 as a WG work item?
>
> [as chair]
>
> Now that we have a revised version of the Liess draft, shall
> we adopt it as a WG work item, that is, as the base for
> completing the work of this working group?
>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email