Re: [salud] Shall we adopt draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-03 as a WG work item?

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Fri, 19 November 2010 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: salud@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA1A3A687C for <salud@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:22:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfP0LoBZ3ZmE for <salud@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32753A6872 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAKoz5kzGmAcF/2dsb2JhbACiXHGkCQKZMYVLBIRaiSk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,223,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="250947867"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2010 11:22:52 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,223,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="542733765"
Received: from dc-us1hcex2.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX2.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.21]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2010 11:22:52 -0500
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.1.90]) by DC-US1HCEX2.global.avaya.com ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:22:51 -0500
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: "salud@ietf.org" <salud@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:22:22 -0500
Thread-Topic: [salud] Shall we adopt draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-03 as a WG work item?
Thread-Index: AQHLh1oMcpP69GiPsEath4HT7oi295N4/S8A
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A3F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A32@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A32@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [salud] Shall we adopt draft-liess-dispatch-alert-info-urns-03 as a WG work item?
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:22:24 -0000

[as individual]

Yes.

Dale