Re: [salud] Section 7 update

Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> Wed, 03 April 2013 11:53 UTC

Return-Path: <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7FB21F850C for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 04:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhWcIvkzBD8b for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 04:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5723421F84CC for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 04:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u10so1496077lbi.17 for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=I6WI5vI8m5V7fbi5Wp0vS0iGKISmFOtC9duXMKyABvk=; b=k3pKHXIHZnSRe77SfZrrLjvFg8qu+hnuuANMBWMrZtVtIBdQVzSDxDgTfrMBQ88+Oo LbJ8A66NMkOtVTlTorJVxUpalC5uUElHR6/lOarOBVSiwK/ct8Bsv83qN0pV/jUgsqlr Pq0/YnCAb1EfukNdcsV+dvKF+PiuuIM1MuoYv8q1pNTyf90t6AXCuev0YnracpXvY7kM 6cJiMdeHe1t8ycuCeVUhn7lzaKnpgsvkkJ3LYFkJdxdPGsLQ7U5RA1FjNeCm/nNXONYm 8MXJx45EoOeV4TzvtZ7A/8eXOHseekofCfCTLGKXL43ZGPo8CSYm4Ul/ToU8uCrK8prk NiPw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.146.34 with SMTP id sz2mr949523lbb.4.1364989992353; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.95.99 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 04:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201303291937.r2TJb2bq1421580@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <201303291937.r2TJb2bq1421580@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:53:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CACWXZj1kE5apVzu=RZ-YXYnnv8r9UqJMU+sxcmMucTCZ7noqCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b3a85c89dc94d04d9737ff5"
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] Section 7 update
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:53:20 -0000

Dale,
I read the text and I am OK with it.

2013/3/29 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>

.....................................

>
>
>    Within a URN, all <alert-label> components that follow a
>    <private-name> but are before any following <private-name>s are
>    additional private extensions whose meaning is defined by the
>    organization defining the <private-name>.
>
>    A URN that contains a private extension can be further subdivided
>    by the private extension of a different organization:  the second
>    organization adds a <private-name> component containing a
>    <provider> that is valid for the second organiztiion.
>
> *** In the next paragraph, I use <alert-label>, but we really need a
>     syntax term for "an <alert-ind-part> that is an <alert-label>.
>     We need to look into that.
>


The note applies to the penultimate paragraph, doesn't it? In this case, I
think it is quite clear from the text what is meant.

Thank you
Laura