Re: [salud] Section 7 update
<R.Jesske@telekom.de> Wed, 03 April 2013 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <R.Jesske@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5624821F8B11 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 05:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xxQJ7xrMA-zQ for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 05:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail43.telekom.de (tcmail43.telekom.de [80.149.113.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42C521F8B0C for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 05:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he113676.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.99.29]) by tcmail41.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 03 Apr 2013 14:01:01 +0200
Received: from HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.134.93.17]) by HE113676.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:00:49 +0200
From: R.Jesske@telekom.de
To: laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com, worley@ariadne.com
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:00:49 +0200
Thread-Topic: [salud] Section 7 update
Thread-Index: Ac4wYdiw39JkPuT8TM6/LE202bhjlwAAPQAA
Message-ID: <580BEA5E3B99744AB1F5BFF5E9A3C67D16E6424732@HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <201303291937.r2TJb2bq1421580@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj1kE5apVzu=RZ-YXYnnv8r9UqJMU+sxcmMucTCZ7noqCw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACWXZj1kE5apVzu=RZ-YXYnnv8r9UqJMU+sxcmMucTCZ7noqCw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_580BEA5E3B99744AB1F5BFF5E9A3C67D16E6424732HE111648emea1_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] Section 7 update
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:01:06 -0000
Hi Dale, from my side +1. -Roland ________________________________ Von: salud-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:salud-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Laura Liess Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. April 2013 13:53 An: Dale R. Worley Cc: salud@ietf.org Betreff: Re: [salud] Section 7 update Dale, I read the text and I am OK with it. 2013/3/29 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com<mailto:worley@ariadne.com>> ..................................... Within a URN, all <alert-label> components that follow a <private-name> but are before any following <private-name>s are additional private extensions whose meaning is defined by the organization defining the <private-name>. A URN that contains a private extension can be further subdivided by the private extension of a different organization: the second organization adds a <private-name> component containing a <provider> that is valid for the second organiztiion. *** In the next paragraph, I use <alert-label>, but we really need a syntax term for "an <alert-ind-part> that is an <alert-label>. We need to look into that. The note applies to the penultimate paragraph, doesn't it? In this case, I think it is quite clear from the text what is meant. Thank you Laura
- [salud] Section 7 update Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] Section 7 update Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] Section 7 update R.Jesske