IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [salud] Expert opinions on the Salud URN namespace

Dale R Worley <worley@TheWorld.com> Wed, 03 October 2012 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A79621F8568 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.98
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jj67M1DNp9Td for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [192.74.137.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CBA21F866C for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q93GLN6A019803 for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:21:25 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id q93GFdo23898015 for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:15:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id q93GFdE83885697; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 12:15:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:15:39 -0400
Message-Id: <201210031615.q93GFdE83885697@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: Dale R Worley <worley@TheWorld.com>
To: salud@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CACWXZj2bHifbaoANLThR4nFJ0fU2+qAUCMuXsWWwcWByYtOvkA@mail.gmail.com> (laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com)
Subject: Re: [salud] Expert opinions on the Salud URN namespace
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:48:14 -0000

> From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
> 
> My main concern with some of the approaches [...]
> is the backward compatibility issue.  At least
> urn:alert:service:call-waiting has been added to the 3GPP IMS
> specification some years ago and is now up and running in many
> systems, mainly customer end devices. [...]

And urn:alert:service:normal appears in
draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances.

I would prefer that we can keep something very close to the current
design.  But it seems to me that moving the "private name" information
out of the URNs would be backward compatible.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email