Re: [salud] Expert opinions on the Salud URN namespace

Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> Thu, 04 October 2012 12:15 UTC

Return-Path: <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C997321F8691 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 05:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.828
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.828 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3dXvxRR1dx4c for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 05:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195EF21F860D for <salud@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 05:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so966307iec.31 for <salud@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 05:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Zpfqb4YdHhSWN28X2rtPz/a8ELpipCQE2MMdVBTYtpI=; b=txw2neARwllbKzAAoUMwNo7WOBzIVP6RuPMVXRh5HTLGifzocHf47hZrVfj0FAzvr6 kHC/v38fK6p0PTUATtkn3SZoTyrSgljIOPqcO3PRCEH0DRVEXpSagsmMiOB1/DptUTM4 6jsl3/s1VkYIsDPKFX6CGq52GBPp+q7eC38HDgbBGofmVfkUcaAayL/a53NzDKOmpbm+ 17o0qy8lsxloGxqIl4OVyo5kTwbNYbxj7hB/9XmQrlP+3ojjOdroAevnkyQfihsVdtXl VYvHIGVBLo2UsertPnLuV/ILZym3pA4d01EsNYMtvhIttM4EPyDPydUHEOi1UxwVCRW3 OiSQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.160.228 with SMTP id xn4mr16336319igb.1.1349352900360; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 05:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.9.204 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 05:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201210031615.q93GFdE83885697@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <CACWXZj2bHifbaoANLThR4nFJ0fU2+qAUCMuXsWWwcWByYtOvkA@mail.gmail.com> <201210031615.q93GFdE83885697@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:15:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CACWXZj1Y851HXF_QeGhVKoMLPoPfJfZrbKr8OpFYbR6Ev__=tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
To: Dale R Worley <worley@theworld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] Expert opinions on the Salud URN namespace
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:15:02 -0000

2012/10/3 Dale R Worley <worley@theworld.com>:

>
> And urn:alert:service:normal appears in
> draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances.

This is correct. I just lost sight of it.
>
> I would prefer that we can keep something very close to the current
> design.  But it seems to me that moving the "private name" information
> out of the URNs would be backward compatible.

I am not aware about any implementation or even specification based on
the "private name" mechanism.

Laura

>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud