Re: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call

Christer Holmberg <> Fri, 30 May 2014 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347281A03D3 for <>; Fri, 30 May 2014 02:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aD6jDy9YUe6B for <>; Fri, 30 May 2014 02:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A56D1A03C2 for <>; Fri, 30 May 2014 02:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79a56d000006536-4e-538850bc4a33
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D0.AA.25910.CB058835; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:34:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:34:51 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call
Thread-Index: AQHPe1Oqm+cjF/zR8UGZsF9fggnmIJtY3hRA
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:34:51 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6egI5gg6M7pC3udhxgtHh5osyB yWPy/q/MHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgylj+cSdTwTKBiiV7FzI1MJ7l7WLk5JAQMJHY /WQPE4QtJnHh3nq2LkYuDiGBo4wSj+bPZYZwFjNKPLyxF8jh4GATsJDo/qcN0iAi4CPxvO0D WLOwgJHE863zGSHixhKNey4wQ9hGEv/2T2YHsVkEVCXmLzkGZvMK+EqcP/gErF5IwF7i2q4m VhCbU8BBYkXjEbCZjEAHfT+1BsxmFhCXuPVkPtShAhJL9pxnhrBFJV4+/scKYStKtD9tYISo 15FYsPsTG4StLbFs4WtmiL2CEidnPmGZwCg6C8nYWUhaZiFpmYWkZQEjyypG0eLU4qTcdCMj vdSizOTi4vw8vbzUkk2MwCg5uOW3wQ7Gl88dDzEKcDAq8fAuKG0PFmJNLCuuzD3EKM3BoiTO e1GjOlhIID2xJDU7NbUgtSi+qDQntfgQIxMHp1QDI0epMJPDwjcW63Y0njk1R2/6jaTb9/d+ 5FyRaGl0oO3msVXmM+qfZYvwmXA/OVy39suKF6aqHwT3xK+5MmHDF52e/7kP3WZteKga0bwz s15k9Y+OU8f0bv5hvs1QkMFqEZ4R1GG6eJLdH3/JX15Xc9v5NL9M47hz9rHosa9MinnVYVdE P+98tECJpTgj0VCLuag4EQCXn0TCcwIAAA==
Subject: Re: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:35:00 -0000


The changes look ok to me.



-----Original Message-----
From: salud [] On Behalf Of Dale R. Worley
Sent: 29. toukokuuta 2014 18:36
Subject: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call

[as an author]

I've assembled a draft incorporating many of the changes that have been discussed.  This isn't an official "revision 12.1" because I am not the editor -- it's just to show the wording of the current proposals and what the whole text looks like with those changes.

I've attempted to include everything which is tentatively agreed upon, that is, every proposed change for which there seems to be no outstanding disagreements.  What I haven't included is:

- what <provider> values are

- the policy for creating new standard URNs

- the exact description of the IANA registry (because that depends on
  the policy question)

- the guidelines for creating new public or private URNs (because that
  involves the policy question)

The one proposal that I have omitted is one from the IESG to move the requirements to an appendix, because it appears that incorporating requirements into body sections is common practice.

As far as I know, all objections and comments from the Secdir and Gen-art reviews and the IESG call are in one of the above three categories.

The XML and text versions can be obtained from

You can see the diffs between revision 12 and this draft with!&


salud mailing list