Re: [SAM] draft-kolberg-sam-baseline-protocol-00

Dr Mario Kolberg <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk> Thu, 08 April 2010 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: sam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7EC3A6825 for <sam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nT-VQOQGS1Ox for <sam@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailscanner1.stir.ac.uk (mailscanner1.stir.ac.uk [139.153.12.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7F83A6407 for <sam@irtf.org>; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yen.cs.stir.ac.uk ([139.153.254.70]) by mailscanner1.stir.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk>) id 1NzoCg-0002pM-0T; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:39:15 +0100
Received: from [139.153.48.14] by yen.cs.stir.ac.uk (8.9.3) id KAA12186; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:38:53 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4BBDA42D.8000602@cs.stir.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:38:53 +0100
From: Dr Mario Kolberg <mko@cs.stir.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gustavo Carneiro <gjcarneiro@gmail.com>
References: <y2wa467ca4f1004071054v35602b3axacd6b774e16da524@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <y2wa467ca4f1004071054v35602b3axacd6b774e16da524@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: 1NzoCg-0002pM-0T
X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-stir.ac.uk-MailScanner-From: mko@cs.stir.ac.uk
MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1271324357.60579@Vb6v0l7hZ+2gkiUV1sqp/g
Cc: sam@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [SAM] draft-kolberg-sam-baseline-protocol-00
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:39:55 -0000

Dear Gustavo,

many thanks for your comments.

> Another not so clear item is how the API in Sec. 5 articulates with Sec. 
> 6.  Sec.6 starts like this:
> 
>     In this document we define messages for hybrid overlay multicast
>     tree creation...
> 
> 
> I get the feeling this used to be a separate draft that was converted to 
> a section of another draft.  I suppose that the Protocol described is 
> triggered by API calls of the Sec. 5 API, but I get the feeling I am 
> guessing what should be explicitly stated in the document.  In that 
> sense, draft-waehlisch-sam-common-api-02 (Fig. 2) is clearer.

Yes section 5 is the API to the application, whereas section 6 describes 
the API between nodes. And yes this draft is based on a number of 
previous drafts. The aim is to align them and to form a base document 
for the WG. I accept there is still some work to be done.

Mario



-- 
The Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2009/2010
The University of Stirling is a charity registered in Scotland, 
 number SC 011159.