IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sasl] Discussion about SAML&OpenID SASL mechanisms during the Apps Area meeting in Anaheim

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 24 February 2010 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: sasl@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sasl@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17623A8495 for <sasl@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:51:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.175
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.175 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eQCAc4QKn0oe for <sasl@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:51:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72DD3A8485 for <sasl@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.2.142] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <S4UTUQBl=kg8@rufus.isode.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:53:59 +0000
Message-ID: <4B851340.2030800@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:53:36 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Tom Yu <tlyu@MIT.EDU>
References: <4B7DC36A.2080105@isode.com> <ldvr5obd6ob.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ldvr5obd6ob.fsf@cathode-dark-space.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sasl@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sasl] Discussion about SAML&OpenID SASL mechanisms during the Apps Area meeting in Anaheim
X-BeenThere: sasl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SASL Working Group <sasl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sasl>, <mailto:sasl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sasl>
List-Post: <mailto:sasl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sasl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sasl>, <mailto:sasl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:51:54 -0000

Tom Yu wrote:

>Do we have any reason for SASL to meet in Anaheim?  We're basically
>done with most of the existing SASL work items, and the WG conflicts
>imply that the new mechanism proposals should get presented during the
>Apps Area meeting.
>
>Put another way, is there a reason I shouldn't cancel the SASL WG
>session for Anaheim?
>  
>
<hat type='individual'>
I don't see a reason to meet, so cancelling the slot is fine.

In fact, we should start discussing closure of the WG, as there doesn't 
seem to be any energy to finish remaing documents on our charter.
We should also discuss what to do with existing WG documents, if 
authors/editors want to get them finished (inside or outside of the SASL 
WG).
</hat>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email