IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sasl] Discussion about SAML&OpenID SASL mechanisms during the Apps Area meeting in Anaheim

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 03 March 2010 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sasl@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sasl@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D8E28C195 for <sasl@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.700, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kr3Ait+oBwnM for <sasl@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4375528C1A6 for <sasl@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 13:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,576,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="57692253"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2010 21:17:42 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp8172.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp8172.cisco.com [10.61.95.235]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o23LHguU017283; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:17:42 GMT
Message-ID: <4B8ED1F5.3000100@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:17:41 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2pre) Gecko/20100120 Lanikai/3.1a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
References: <4B8ECEE7.6050109@KingsMountain.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B8ECEE7.6050109@KingsMountain.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: IETF SASL WG list <sasl@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sasl] Discussion about SAML&OpenID SASL mechanisms during the Apps Area meeting in Anaheim
X-BeenThere: sasl@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SASL Working Group <sasl.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sasl>, <mailto:sasl-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sasl>
List-Post: <mailto:sasl@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sasl-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sasl>, <mailto:sasl-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 21:17:51 -0000

  How about starting with the authors?  If you would like a more public 
forum, so long as the chairs don't object, I'd be happy with sasl@ietf.org.

Eliot

On 3/3/10 10:04 PM, =JeffH wrote:
> Eliot, Klaas, Hannes, & Hank,
>
>> If you – or anyone else –  have substantial comments to make the 
>> documents less "handwavy", the authors would be grateful.  These are 
>> individual -00s, btw.  We would expect the docs to evolve.  We're 
>> also looking for comments on the general approach.
>
> Which mailing list should comments be sent to, sasl@  ?
>
> thanks,
>
> =JeffH
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email