[Sat] WG Last Call for comments: draft-ietf-satp-architecture-02

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Sat, 09 March 2024 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: sat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2932C14F6E8 for <sat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 06:08:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hardakers.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ped2DLtokNPn for <sat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 06:08:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [107.220.113.177]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4874CC14F6E4 for <sat@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 06:08:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [174.128.214.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8255322D46 for <sat@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 06:08:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.hardakers.net 8255322D46
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hardakers.net; s=default; t=1709993300; bh=gW3oyWN1vl38J7vNK7h+Oi8yayNUsvDyuViV5r8QXN0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=marDWyIP5i6QDZOnwfSvwoavWppbNrIx8CJDbrtMnrwmHZTETPLq8RXAVOqrJnLwY P3Ly5PLk1tbn/oCKoA2aEMgr+K4StcRZv698ZzUa3+gYvV+FOAECGqyRYZb59LTAdd Z1UPkL6lMKIkgkobU35fciMxFDmMmnKLJzbWC4iw=
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: sat@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 06:08:04 -0800
Message-ID: <yblbk7nh517.fsf@wx.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sat/RT1d8qqZUT7iFAozelgXr9mGA54>
Subject: [Sat] WG Last Call for comments: draft-ietf-satp-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The purpose of this mailing-list is to discuss the secure asset transfer \(SAT\) protocol and related aspects." <sat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sat>, <mailto:sat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sat/>
List-Post: <mailto:sat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sat>, <mailto:sat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 14:08:31 -0000

Greetings all,

The authors have requested that draft-ietf-satp-architecture-02 be placed into WG last call and after a review by the chairs we agree it's ready to progress forward.  I have some personal comments that I'll submit during last call, but nothing substantive or process-problematic that should hold up it progressing.  Thus, we have changed the document's status to being in WG LC and have set a deadline of 4 weeks from now.  Thus, WG LC will end on April 6th, AOE (anywhere on earth).

We encourage all participants of the WG to read the document,  suggest any changes you feel are needed from simple editorial suggestions to calling out major issues you find with the document.  WG participants should also express their opinions about whether or not the document is ready to progress and you support it's publication.

All comments should be sent to the mailing list.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI