Re: [Sat] WG Last Call for comments: draft-ietf-satp-architecture-02

[[e-mail]]

Hi:
  I have a problem with the architecture document because it contains only
small sections related to security.
The SAT process will come under intense threat from external theft and
internal fraud.
The architecture document focuses on a clean asset exchange where everyone
is honest and uses well tested software.

I am not an expert on blockchain or related technologies so the experts in
the WG should add to the architecture document
the features necessary to deal with the threats.

Question:  Do we want to revisit the architecture document when the threats
to the SAT process are enumerated?

David Millman

-----Original Message-----
From: sat <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Wes Hardaker
Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2024 9:08 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Sat] WG Last Call for comments: draft-ietf-satp-architecture-02


Greetings all,

The authors have requested that draft-ietf-satp-architecture-02 be placed
into WG last call and after a review by the chairs we agree it's ready to
progress forward.  I have some personal comments that I'll submit during
last call, but nothing substantive or process-problematic that should hold
up it progressing.  Thus, we have changed the document's status to being in
WG LC and have set a deadline of 4 weeks from now.  Thus, WG LC will end on
April 6th, AOE (anywhere on earth).

We encourage all participants of the WG to read the document,  suggest any
changes you feel are needed from simple editorial suggestions to calling out
major issues you find with the document.  WG participants should also
express their opinions about whether or not the document is ready to
progress and you support it's publication.

All comments should be sent to the mailing list.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

-- 
sat mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sat