IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [savi] Which vendors have coded and which operators have deployed?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sun, 08 May 2016 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC7512D508 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2016 19:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6i7ZPeC5zmvQ for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2016 19:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6261C12D501 for <savi@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 May 2016 19:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 30497A4; Sun, 8 May 2016 04:07:54 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1462673274; bh=q2RZToXpAtgVP2zM6KG7pdBRrB6i9j/1WIrcdwrDUWA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oS89bE4YRgkaxy7iYVxtBrzqIN+t5QdQuayi731k1FacYc5qXCeKZLli3dxEkojcM mKamVx47VtNocD8r9WXvVENvWpCI0xdCik5EUqB5Duhlz2cSEhByZYfzc3gaMisoV0 ZoKIFVnPUKMSO+icXI+KqXVJI0pVqJqDwBfaBRM4=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287E5A3; Sun, 8 May 2016 04:07:54 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 04:07:54 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Bingyang Liu <bjornliu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPLDopKaqzWzuD4+kikkdzuJkJp+ME-BQU4Ny3KduH0WLh+RBw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605080404520.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <29929BBA-5744-42FC-8C3E-AC381A91A986@senki.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605071117210.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAPLDopKaqzWzuD4+kikkdzuJkJp+ME-BQU4Ny3KduH0WLh+RBw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/YekZhCt7LDvtisz6DZZMSguQgrs>
Cc: SAVI Mailing List <savi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [savi] Which vendors have coded and which operators have deployed?
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/savi/>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 02:07:59 -0000

On Sun, 8 May 2016, Bingyang Liu wrote:

> I'm also interested in it. Wondering how many have coded and how many have
> deployed.
>
> We've just coded SAVI-FCFS, SAVI-DHCP and SAVI-DHCPv6 and the mix of them
> in SDN, or OpenFlow controller specifically.

http://ssnf.org/nat-i-varldsklass/ska/ska-certifierade-produkter/

It's in Swedish, but you'll find products that have passed the (now fairly 
old) test. Quite a few of the documents saying how to configure things are 
in english.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status