Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects
<Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com> Tue, 14 February 2012 21:34 UTC
Return-Path: <Kent_Landfield@mcafee.com>
X-Original-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F338221E801D for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8AdjkyprJgmS for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dalsmrelay2.nai.com (dalsmrelay2.nai.com [205.227.136.216]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617DC21F8575 for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown [10.64.5.52]) by dalsmrelay2.nai.com with smtp id 023d_6acb_8a4fbce0_5753_11e1_b9f8_00219b929abd; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:33:31 -0600
Received: from AMERDALEXMB1.corp.nai.org ([fe80::387d:3d79:ad3b:b517]) by DALEXHT2.corp.nai.org ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:32:06 -0600
From: Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com
To: amontville@tripwire.com, scap_interest@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:32:38 -0600
Thread-Topic: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects
Thread-Index: AczrYBjlQyR9g0QLSw2SR2ATX9Tszg==
Message-ID: <CB602E89.2C54F%kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB600E53.9221%amontville@tripwire.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CB602E892C54Fkentlandfieldmcafeecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects
X-BeenThere: scap_interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion List for IETFers interested in the Security Content Automation Protocol \(SCAP\)." <scap_interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scap_interest>
List-Post: <mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:34:09 -0000
Adam, We have more than enough on our plate with the specification / I-D work. Let's see if we can deal with this in a more appropriate forum. I do not see this as that forum. My 2cents… Thanks. Kent Landfield Director Content Strategy, Architecture and Standards McAfee | An Intel Company 5000 Headquarters Dr. Plano, Texas 75024 Direct: +1.972.963.7096 Mobile: +1.817.637.8026 Web: www.mcafee.com<http://www.mcafee.com/> From: Adam Montville <amontville@tripwire.com<mailto:amontville@tripwire.com>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:12:51 -0600 To: "scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>" <scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>> Subject: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects While we're all bantering about on security automation, there's another side to the story. Are there any operational concerns we might address within a WG should one be formed? For example, we have, in the United States, NVD hosting a repository of information. CCE identifiers are moderated and assigned by an operational process. As new enumerations are published and new types of content are conceived, it's easy to imagine the need for some operational standardization. Should we consider standardizing some of these processes, and if so would the WG we seek to establish be the appropriate place for that work? Regards, Adam W. Montville | Security and Compliance Architect Direct: 503 276-7661 Mobile: 360 471-7815 TRIPWIRE | Take CONTROL http://www.tripwire.com _______________________________________________ scap_interest mailing list scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest
- [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Adam Montville
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Kent_Landfield
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Adam Montville
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Luis Nunez
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Adam Montville
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Gunnar Engelbach
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Kent_Landfield
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Waltermire, David A.
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Adam Montville
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Waltermire, David A.
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Chandrashekhar B
- Re: [scap_interest] Operational Aspects Jerome Athias