Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?

Gayan Gunawardana <gayan@wso2.com> Sat, 11 March 2017 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <gayan@wso2.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE27D1294E0 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:40:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wso2.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G0S9ucy3N5H3 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:40:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6561293DB for <scim@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id n11so8442053wma.0 for <scim@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:40:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wso2.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GX+Pui3PVm8WPnDzvIosccV93UVIUozp11ZXuHZr2rY=; b=i4EcbXzReAOwmA5qwrY27fCinl0LMtv78+almgVFMfZOEuJBZ4cTYcyFhdHnqMM7YN wtOKcKRET+sFetLEFsIfryp6NaIc5rmAL+B9vTgvNA0tDGw7e7iNoq8YjDWQj6Fpv4tt Seew0HTDYJT5eZ2pHAEVWCxNkpNCM4halLros=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GX+Pui3PVm8WPnDzvIosccV93UVIUozp11ZXuHZr2rY=; b=l5a4h1GuaBLPnWW1C9qW0wHaw9bzndYGQ8qAaaCipde2BDM8vtnvgaUvhOqdwrFsQt awPtSfX+0NUj2pl7OaiRPmoq67vHX41qvbWRgk+GjB3GmnR2tOX525+m9dHIyHomU3UP rvRHrlTEllRf7S0vd/jtaN5UGLGJBmakp0+MTGhqSq9WHtsKJ44+7uFNl/up13E4ZtW0 yGTsbuRNCPk5z8cOrh+pVprM1G/8a/63NAqmSX34SeeBNl5djp+QpybXkqt5UIGblYFw Yp/x9AO0ag1YjqLndn4kQqPUPR5KhZb2xnzJJZwAoFf55cX3wDOLsECir/+X6Jt8auJF 29Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H187hyCqSE9/cQ+Q4FWrIbFbUHOvPmoHsVXH2bCMxkRabUljy1R5vKRs6QGpdelUfVNgirqBVHyPq1ZP9QK
X-Received: by 10.28.234.147 with SMTP id g19mr1795709wmi.102.1489210807005; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:40:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.143.109 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:40:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAF2hCbYqF=9M3FBtaf+mkAfRhTeaXivo+PmtCygT0DkFo8ttMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN2oXrCHc3OFoUWf+TUSZTO+OAU2iLmZ+MfRMbgT0uRyzFFuHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF2hCbZ-6vtKELAdgeaeg-iyEpHb-ZS0PQshNg0VuxUa1We7hA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN2oXrCaqddXkvgePM4r9yHh6roW8opYsx1=qM0-wE2jMP_ZDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF2hCbYqF=9M3FBtaf+mkAfRhTeaXivo+PmtCygT0DkFo8ttMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gayan Gunawardana <gayan@wso2.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:10:06 +0530
Message-ID: <CALzgRADKSPxRwVBskZzcr+SJK=5aJUerF=Yyg9FfnLa1KfmCTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146e55825ce24054a6de9ef"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/JYFpusDrtQ94hnghvEPjczU4laE>
Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>, Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com>, Omindu Rathnaweera <omindu.dishan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:40:11 -0000

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> wrote:

> The SCIM 1.1 tests where made by me and Erik Wahlström.
>
> The code can be found here <https://github.com/erwah/scimproxy> and here
> <https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info>
>
Thanks Samuel and Erik.
It would be great if you can provide brief idea about above two
repositories and how test suit has been organized.

>
>
> Don´t think you should rely to much on the structure setup there.
>
Yes but will be really helpful to just get an abstract idea.

>
> //Samuel
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Darshana Gunawardana <
> darshanasbg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Samuel,
>>
>> Thanks for the response..!
>>
>> My colleges from WSO2 are in the process of implementing SCIM 2.0 server
>> and currently people working on improving the test coverage on that.
>>
>> If there is no work done on this, we can check on creating common SCIM
>> 2.0 suite and contributing back to the community. Wanted to check whether
>> it would be useful to implement common SCIM 2.0 suite thing.
>>
>> If this is something useful to have, we can check on possible ways of
>> getting interested persons...
>>
>> And can I know references on the implementations on the test suite done
>> on SCIM 1.1? So I can get an idea on the current design and effort needed
>> to implement in that way.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Darshana
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> wrote:
>>
>>> There is currently no such tool as far as I know.
>>>
>>> That it says ongoing is a bit too optimistic, there is no ongoing work
>>> as far as I know.
>>>
>>> You are not the only one asking for this so maybe a few persons could do
>>> some cooperation and create something.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 07:37, Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is there a test tool that can used to check compliance with the SCIM
>>>> 2.0 specification?
>>>>
>>>> The site [1] specifies that there is an ongoing effort. Is this an open
>>>> source effort where someone interested can try prototype versions and
>>>> contribute for the development?
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.simplecloud.info/
>>>> [2] "Work on SCIM 2.0 tests is under development and there are
>>>> currently no support for the enterprise extension"
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> With Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Darshana Gunawardana,
>>>> Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
>>>> University of Moratuwa,
>>>> Sri Lanka
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> scim mailing list
>>>> scim@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Regards,
>>
>> Darshana Gunawardana,
>> Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
>> University of Moratuwa,
>> Sri Lanka
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>
>


-- 
Gayan Gunawardana
Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/
Email: gayan@wso2.com
Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933