Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?
Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> Mon, 18 September 2017 09:05 UTC
Return-Path: <samuel@erdtman.se>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B200313420E for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=erdtman-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70cNRheU9MPQ for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92B03134212 for <scim@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id b11so4625577pgn.12 for <scim@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=erdtman-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5cK8hVvav3JdRs4a4nzZEZdz0WNqfMhVvicC/3b/Qcg=; b=vH3uPIKPiUdFDN2xxvrJUvyQfQV/Z7zFncOBB+VeL7BtVMSnuJjXnMctIqMVmH2Lpo tE3EHhglS1fEgZ64OfFE4Qi9p10X78+NOzzNVbfoQq5AjbjtzfSWUcRXHkHN/R7YYjHX eBIqrH0Txvwym7FsnUGJEmcD51nNoeQqS1RZRskdBeoz3hKWXjWedC2RvJ4Fzt0Q8CbB 22GTY8Tf74Kgpddu6Dc1EimB5I/NEAiW2sxYibfy6+md4+9i4ZSUYAdKFoIRgwTbUJ9Z OCVn4nU/8APn4dxCer/e99Qy+x6yzr87PpLQitKthe6bWEBzLVzvf1tneFSml4e4fBWk ATIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5cK8hVvav3JdRs4a4nzZEZdz0WNqfMhVvicC/3b/Qcg=; b=WUiesekkml6glkW/fD4U06fdAIfeUIUOBRlNqeUE7TyHtTOeClgR+4ajBRRrMgexvP V16CYlHwakmSWUU5A5v/4LpfPLZTE0xe2YEtbJXVpTL27dwCDzHQcCfiZVVtGvl1QaET atjUcgceT0Gey1E4pKyCAqvWlh6+FzaOKmEdWYo6e0i9F/cp5uMSNQCBYXhIHpnsRVpn gRRZLycL92rC5YN13Zrqqf9cF8abrfdeQKxQVarIPUMWHyK3oCDbYeHbcQQpopFIxXNW rxuppU2OVRbqsstfF1P4fSK7eGqQ2Pp7U5tp9YdElLOOuog3BW7q2UzgtsGttooCorMa U9oA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiqCzgRb/dejXv0PrgQ4AlI/YWuCxBrMufOCV3rE8D0ee8N0K30 HEARG2OwwBjvowSeoyMgez+SFCSsZWJEZnr6sriPcg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4a1RR3VmWxlF8FBr8si8XIuwRIwp03zZwBFbakzkJIqDKLspkFLsh0l65aKl822KDkPsCS+KRhCcDFxrF2pMA=
X-Received: by 10.99.112.24 with SMTP id l24mr30649604pgc.302.1505725541792; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.154.171 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 02:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAN2oXrC7Np9OssJ_d+TJHjjbTtvk8H4Qtn+2e9TbpwcjQu2EUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN2oXrCHc3OFoUWf+TUSZTO+OAU2iLmZ+MfRMbgT0uRyzFFuHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF2hCbZ-6vtKELAdgeaeg-iyEpHb-ZS0PQshNg0VuxUa1We7hA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN2oXrCaqddXkvgePM4r9yHh6roW8opYsx1=qM0-wE2jMP_ZDQ@mail.gmail.com> <C24AF6E0-C290-437C-B5E8-DCB0A827CCEF@oracle.com> <CAN2oXrBYqmOsd6dGGzH60kcYZ6zVxJWLpFUgs4scw48ym0P-dQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN2oXrC7Np9OssJ_d+TJHjjbTtvk8H4Qtn+2e9TbpwcjQu2EUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:05:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF2hCbYztSOQY0Fes_+UpBkV4XsCu3FCWMnEWi-vLj5BxQ14aQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com>
Cc: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, vindula.13@cse.mrt.ac.lk, "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>, Omindu Rathnaweera <omindu.dishan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c7b200c4fa90559730c3b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/LqMihC0oWiqJGOW91FCc3P8sM54>
Subject: Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:05:46 -0000
As the main updater of simplecloud.info I think this is an awesome initiative. I will try to find some time to look it through to see if your work could easily be incorporated in simplecloud.info (it might take a few weeks before I have managed to do this) Cheers //Samuel On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi all, > > Giving you an update about on the topic. > > We were able to get a GSoC project slot for the above proposal and the > elected student -Vindula who cc'ed here- was able to come up with a > promising implementation on the project. > > - GSoC Project URL: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/projects/# > 6261985816608768 > - VIndula's blog on the project: https://medium.com/@ > vindulajayawardana/scim-2-0-compliance-test-suite-737fd4ace3cc > <https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/scim-2-0-compliance-test-suite-737fd4ace3cc> > - Source Repo: https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance- > test-suite > - Hosted Demo: https://compliance-scim2.wso2apps.com/ > scimproxycompliance/ > > With the increasing adoption of the SCIM 2.0, this test suite will be a > strong initial step to validate interoperability, yet i'm sure there is > much room to improve. So, > > Try the hosted demo > > If you see have any suggestion to improve, open a git issue on the source > repo <https://github.com/wso2-incubator/scim2-compliance-test-suite> > > If you know the fix, send a PR.. > > Any kind of feedback would be highly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Darshana Gunawardana < > darshanasbg@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> Thanks all for your responses. >> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> There has been discussion about having OpenID Foundation host some >>> tests. However, so far, nobody has volunteered to write the tests or fund >>> their support. If we can generate interest, maybe we can make it happen. >>> >> >> A few of us at WSO2 thought about a suitable way to generate interest on >> this. >> >> WSO2 has been a mentor organization for GSoC for the last three years and >> also accepted for the same on this year as well. So we have come up with a >> GSoC project proposal on the topic "SCIM 2.0 compliance test suite". You >> can find more details of the project proposal on the below link. >> >> https://docs.wso2.com/display/GSoC/Project+Proposals+for+201 >> 7#ProjectProposalsfor2017-Proposal21:[IS]SCIM2.0compliancetestsuite >> >> Any suggestions on the project proposal are highly appreciated. >> >> The good news is, we already have one interested applicant on this >> project!!! >> >> Hopefully we will have more applicants.. and a decent student proposal to >> proceed with.. >> >> Thanks, >> Darshana >> >> >>> >>> Note: The IETF does not seem to handle inter-op test suites and >>> certifications. At least not in my experience. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> Oracle Corporation, Identity Cloud Services & Identity Standards >>> @independentid >>> www.independentid.com >>> phil.hunt@oracle.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 7, 2017, at 12:15 AM, Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Samuel, >>> >>> Thanks for the response..! >>> >>> My colleges from WSO2 are in the process of implementing SCIM 2.0 server >>> and currently people working on improving the test coverage on that. >>> >>> If there is no work done on this, we can check on creating common SCIM >>> 2.0 suite and contributing back to the community. Wanted to check whether >>> it would be useful to implement common SCIM 2.0 suite thing. >>> >>> If this is something useful to have, we can check on possible ways of >>> getting interested persons... >>> >>> And can I know references on the implementations on the test suite done >>> on SCIM 1.1? So I can get an idea on the current design and effort needed >>> to implement in that way. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Darshana >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> wr >>> ote: >>> >>>> There is currently no such tool as far as I know. >>>> >>>> That it says ongoing is a bit too optimistic, there is no ongoing work >>>> as far as I know. >>>> >>>> You are not the only one asking for this so maybe a few persons could >>>> do some cooperation and create something. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 07:37, Darshana Gunawardana < >>>> darshanasbg@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Is there a test tool that can used to check compliance with the SCIM >>>>> 2.0 specification? >>>>> >>>>> The site [1] specifies that there is an ongoing effort. Is this an >>>>> open source effort where someone interested can try prototype versions and >>>>> contribute for the development? >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.simplecloud.info/ >>>>> [2] "Work on SCIM 2.0 tests is under development and there are >>>>> currently no support for the enterprise extension" >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> -- >>>>> With Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Darshana Gunawardana, >>>>> Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, >>>>> University of Moratuwa, >>>>> Sri Lanka >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> scim mailing list >>>>> scim@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With Regards, >>> >>> Darshana Gunawardana, >>> Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, >>> University of Moratuwa, >>> Sri Lanka >>> _______________________________________________ >>> scim mailing list >>> scim@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> With Regards, >> >> Darshana Gunawardana, >> Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, >> University of Moratuwa, >> Sri Lanka >> > > > > -- > With Regards, > > Darshana Gunawardana, > Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, > University of Moratuwa, > Sri Lanka >
- [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite? Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Phil Hunt
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Gayan Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman