Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?
Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 18:49 UTC
Return-Path: <darshanasbg@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088B012995D for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Dcv4Wfuk5p7 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x229.google.com (mail-ot0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A14F12994F for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x229.google.com with SMTP id 19so66805189oti.0 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=I/zwHpLT5bV6n/+eAkHwKfwJOnRrWh+9mlQw0DMUW6E=; b=Xb+Gds6OrR/i5EADcCPgk2lxxRuPsEPwi5+RZ+mB9aL96q2TDZxOkzBmx1rrV1xlld 8H5PO4WtZZhv1MkufVQFgvGpsYcykXuKXcHTpy4mjaZrDr5+WfMh7ixqJvOgFxBcuo/P E/wkgoQ+ZXg3P9LSX4CEe4yufjBXnOArUX7XdwYZpnsah5fgFk0KBSVaHjBB/70KJnUF GicClv4vAI+0c5bIBrfakv/bic75/Y2i8S+4mmU4gNEboKO495tolfzW9vz30H+qE20Z z6y1Mhlu+xGVRhNiTOlRz2Nhs/64Aj0Hfkyamntn3yiCvwbmcuR8HeRvFvP57U13fFEY IX+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=I/zwHpLT5bV6n/+eAkHwKfwJOnRrWh+9mlQw0DMUW6E=; b=nJv2fUt9e1FLkTE2tMdUX9/vi/aLPzQHz70MZeH+tYNd71HlJ/X1k/kXjkkjgZMRZH g/OA7JdGxo1yNkbV9Yyz6jUHbWvJ5awpoO3+2y0b0rL5h+luLmQm7Ij6uAGDP7JDBGaW AoVt+R/MMENdd4P3NE+Kh7CUt+2czhyqNqIwPyppx0LZIuWNfFKfzUMVDFyL2YpALNpT lcSSwmxmQ6pRnbs80933ybEy1P8MJ2feUiHJmvc1vePpzNBkj2oqF3L3ru3AdTe9lYDK SkCY6MLnd/G+XWXF6tY/gJy6iVT1isk9zj39ZAJ+2w9broaasebUCBzFuULFwx9uNt6+ z9iQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2TtOn0z45kqitjHwbdXtCnJxf5CdUcCkh+TEYiH3X2hDLA1KDkVOjsWQNE1wspH/0oFw243Y8gu9lWDQ==
X-Received: by 10.157.82.91 with SMTP id q27mr5049198otg.50.1489690191444; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.34.165 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C24AF6E0-C290-437C-B5E8-DCB0A827CCEF@oracle.com>
References: <CAN2oXrCHc3OFoUWf+TUSZTO+OAU2iLmZ+MfRMbgT0uRyzFFuHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAF2hCbZ-6vtKELAdgeaeg-iyEpHb-ZS0PQshNg0VuxUa1We7hA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN2oXrCaqddXkvgePM4r9yHh6roW8opYsx1=qM0-wE2jMP_ZDQ@mail.gmail.com> <C24AF6E0-C290-437C-B5E8-DCB0A827CCEF@oracle.com>
From: Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:19:30 +0530
Message-ID: <CAN2oXrBYqmOsd6dGGzH60kcYZ6zVxJWLpFUgs4scw48ym0P-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Cc: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>, "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>, Omindu Rathnaweera <omindu.dishan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043c4028afc1f2054add86ef"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/god8I8x-O1qTSAguLniZ6GWeiJs>
Subject: Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:49:55 -0000
Hi folks, Thanks all for your responses. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> wrote: > There has been discussion about having OpenID Foundation host some tests. > However, so far, nobody has volunteered to write the tests or fund their > support. If we can generate interest, maybe we can make it happen. > A few of us at WSO2 thought about a suitable way to generate interest on this. WSO2 has been a mentor organization for GSoC for the last three years and also accepted for the same on this year as well. So we have come up with a GSoC project proposal on the topic "SCIM 2.0 compliance test suite". You can find more details of the project proposal on the below link. https://docs.wso2.com/display/GSoC/Project+Proposals+for+ 2017#ProjectProposalsfor2017-Proposal21:[IS]SCIM2.0compliancetestsuite Any suggestions on the project proposal are highly appreciated. The good news is, we already have one interested applicant on this project!!! Hopefully we will have more applicants.. and a decent student proposal to proceed with.. Thanks, Darshana > > Note: The IETF does not seem to handle inter-op test suites and > certifications. At least not in my experience. > > Phil > > Oracle Corporation, Identity Cloud Services & Identity Standards > @independentid > www.independentid.com > phil.hunt@oracle.com > > > > > > > > On Feb 7, 2017, at 12:15 AM, Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > Thanks for the response..! > > My colleges from WSO2 are in the process of implementing SCIM 2.0 server > and currently people working on improving the test coverage on that. > > If there is no work done on this, we can check on creating common SCIM 2.0 > suite and contributing back to the community. Wanted to check whether it > would be useful to implement common SCIM 2.0 suite thing. > > If this is something useful to have, we can check on possible ways of > getting interested persons... > > And can I know references on the implementations on the test suite done on > SCIM 1.1? So I can get an idea on the current design and effort needed to > implement in that way. > > Thanks, > Darshana > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> wrote: > >> There is currently no such tool as far as I know. >> >> That it says ongoing is a bit too optimistic, there is no ongoing work as >> far as I know. >> >> You are not the only one asking for this so maybe a few persons could do >> some cooperation and create something. >> >> >> On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 07:37, Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a test tool that can used to check compliance with the SCIM 2.0 >>> specification? >>> >>> The site [1] specifies that there is an ongoing effort. Is this an open >>> source effort where someone interested can try prototype versions and >>> contribute for the development? >>> >>> [1] http://www.simplecloud.info/ >>> [2] "Work on SCIM 2.0 tests is under development and there are currently >>> no support for the enterprise extension" >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> With Regards, >>> >>> Darshana Gunawardana, >>> Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, >>> University of Moratuwa, >>> Sri Lanka >>> _______________________________________________ >>> scim mailing list >>> scim@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim >>> >> > > > -- > With Regards, > > Darshana Gunawardana, > Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, > University of Moratuwa, > Sri Lanka > _______________________________________________ > scim mailing list > scim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim > > > -- With Regards, Darshana Gunawardana, Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka
- [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite? Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Phil Hunt
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Gayan Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Darshana Gunawardana
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman
- Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test s… Samuel Erdtman