Re: [scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6004)

Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@yahoo.com> Tue, 10 March 2020 21:35 UTC

From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@yahoo.com>
Message-Id: <34F51C13-3297-4DEE-97E6-6E78DFB74D07@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5CB7E253-B700-4733-9FB8-B0AC33FAA25E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:35:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20200303171714.030FCF4071A@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Morteza Ansari <moransar@cisco.com>, leifj@sunet.se, Shelley <randomshelley@gmail.com>, scim@ietf.org
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20200303171714.030FCF4071A@rfc-editor.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/sro61qJqRAQ_f7m7ybQj_-TBaR8>
Subject: Re: [scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6004)
Precedence: list

VERIFIED

Thanks!

Phil Hunt
phil.hunt@yahoo.com



> On Mar 3, 2020, at 9:17 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7643,
> "System for Cross-domain Identity Management: Core Schema".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6004
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Shelley Baker <randomshelley@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 8.7.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>      {
>        "name" : "name",
>        "type" : "complex",
>        ...
>        "uniqueness" : "none"
>      },
>      ...
>      {
>        "name" : "emails",
>        "type" : "complex",
>        ...
>        "uniqueness" : "none"
>      },
>      ...
>      {
>        "name" : "addresses",
>        "type" : "complex",
>        ...
>        "uniqueness" : "none"
>      },
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>      {
>        "name" : "name",
>        "type" : "complex",
>        ...
>      },
>      ...
>      {
>        "name" : "emails",
>        "type" : "complex",
>        ...
>      },
>      ...
>      {
>        "name" : "addresses",
>        "type" : "complex",
>        ...
>      },
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The "emails", "name", and "addresses" complex user attributes have a "uniqueness" characteristic defined. According to Section 2.3.8, complex attributes have no uniqueness. No other complex attributes in Section 8.7.1 specify a "uniqueness" characteristic. For compliance with Section 2.3.8 and consistency with other attribute definitions, the "uniqueness" sub-attribute for these complex attributes should be removed.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7643 (draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-22)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : System for Cross-domain Identity Management: Core Schema
> Publication Date    : September 2015
> Author(s)           : P. Hunt, Ed., K. Grizzle, E. Wahlstroem, C. Mortimore
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : System for Cross-domain Identity Management
> Area                : Applications and Real-Time
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

[scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6004) RFC Errata System
Re: [scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6… Phil Hunt