Re: [SCITT] Call for adoption

Thanks, Ned.

I'll look at RATS to see if we have any overlap and if so, I'll file an IPR Disclosure.

Thanks,

Dick Brooks

Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 
Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

Never trust software, always verify and report! ™
http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com
Email: dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com
Tel: +1 978-696-1788

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Ned <ned.smith@intel.com> 
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 3:53 PM
To: dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com; 'Eliot Lear' <lear@lear.ch>; 'Hannes Tschofenig' <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>; scitt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [SCITT] Call for adoption - SCITT Architecture

Dick,
Yes, if its relevant. I'm not permitted to look at patent material so I can't help determine if its relevant or not.
-Ned

On 11/14/22, 12:48 PM, "Dick Brooks" <dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com> wrote:

    Ned,

    We submitted an IPR disclosure for the SAG patent, relating to SCITT. 
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5683/

    Do you think we should do the same for RATS?

    Thanks,

    Dick Brooks

    Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 
    Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

    Never trust software, always verify and report! ™
    http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com
    Email: dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com
    Tel: +1 978-696-1788

    -----Original Message-----
    From: SCITT <scitt-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Smith, Ned
    Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 3:04 PM
    To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>; Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>; scitt@ietf.org
    Subject: Re: [SCITT] Call for adoption - SCITT Architecture

    Dick Brooks pointed to:
    >proprietary trust registries in use within the software supply chain today. (https://www.einpresswire.com/article/545051889/announcing-the-sag-ctr-tm-community-trust-registry-for-digitally-signed-software?r=pawKHGm9JeOss4tpbO), 
    which cites IP.

    On 11/14/22, 11:58 AM, "SCITT on behalf of Eliot Lear" <scitt-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lear@lear.ch> wrote:

        I am in favor of adoption, and I would be willing to review the document 
        (as I have in the past).

        However...

        I would request an early IPR check.  We have had a sad record lately of 
        late disclosures.

        Eliot

        On 14.11.22 12:18, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
        > Hi all,
        >
        > Following the positive feedback at the IETF SCITT meeting in London last week we want to start a call for adoption of the SCITT architecture document.
        >
        > Here is the document, which serves as a starting point for future work in the group:
        > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-birkholz-scitt-architecture-02
        >
        > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *November 28th*.
        >
        > Ciao
        > Hannes & Jon
        >
        > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
        >

    -- 
    SCITT mailing list
    SCITT@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scitt