Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presentation at SLC

Behcet,

The slides will be part of the record of the meeting, including the
minutes. When that is complete, Pat or I
will announce to the mailing list where to find them. There is no point
in mailing out the bits to everyone.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: "Behcet Sarikaya" <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>
To: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Cc: <seamoby@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Paging Protocol Assessment Presentation at SLC

> Jim,
>   Are you going to post or not the slides you presented at SLC?
>
>
> James Kempf wrote:
>
> >
> > With regard to the paging assessment, if you look at
> > draft-ietf-seamoby-paging-protocol-assessment-00.txt, you will see
that
> > there is a separate
> > column for rating draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt, and a separate
set of
> > comments. So, even
> > though both drafts were done by the same assessor (which is what I
meant
> > by them
> > being bundled), the assessments were written up separately. However,
> > since
> > draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt does not present a complete solution
for
> > IP paging,
>
> Sorry I do not get this argument.
> The assessment draft gave marks to all drafts and the marks
> draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt received were not less than the marks
others
> received if not more.
> It was your final personal decision presented in the drafts that made
> comments on specifics of each draft. There, unfortunately were no
slides,
> i.e. no assessment of draft-guri-seamoby-lahap-00.txt and it said that
the
> decision on this draft was based on
draft-sarikaya-seamoby-mipv6hp-00.txt.
>
> This was the main point of my previous mail.
> Good to remind.  Let's come to the point. Shall we?
>
> --
> Behcet
>
>

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby