Re: [Seamoby] Confirmation of Concensus on Completing Seamoby Work

FMIP PrxyRtSol/SolPrxyRtAdv are just for delivering the CAR information
after discovery.
In Dycard, the discovery requires messages between MN and AR for delivering
the IP address of the previous AR to the current AR. This is beyond the
purpose of FMIP PrxyRtSol/SolPrxyRtAdv messages.
I wonder whether the proposal is to extend the semantics of FMIP
PrxyRtSol/SolPrxyRtAdv for all the necessary signaling messages between AR
and MN for CARD.

Eunsoo

> Folks,
>
> This email is to confirm the concensus at the IETF 56 meeting to proceed
toward
> completing the Seamoby work and closing the Working Group. This email also
> advances proposals for a couple of other issues that were not discussed at
the
> meeting but are required to close out Seamoby.
>
> CARD:
>       - Drop draft-ietf-seamoby-card-requirements-02.txt.
>       - Take draft-ietf-seamoby-card-protocol-01.txt to Experimental
rather than
>          Proposed Standard
>       - Use FMIP PrxyRtSol/SolPrxyRtAdv as transport for CARD information
on
>         AR-MN interface. Consult with FMIP draft editor about best way to
do
> this..
>       - Complete protocol on AR-AR interface that will support both
learning
> based
>          and server based approaches.
>       - Protocol design complete by IETF 57 in Vienna.
>
> CT:
>
>     - Drop draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-05.txt.
>     - Take draft-ietf-seamobyh-ctp-01.txt to Experimental rather than
>        Proposed Standard.
>     - Complete protocol design by IETF 57 in Vienna.
>
> We did not discuss the following issues, here they are with some
suggestions:
> about how to resolve them
>
>     - What to do with draft-ietf-seamoby-cardiscovery-issues-04.txt.
>        Since a clear statement of the problem is necessary for formulating
>        the research questions, continue to advance this document to
>        Informational.
>
>     - Relationship between CT and FMIP. Since the purpose of
>       Seamoby is to support fast handover, focus on a design
>       that integrated well with FMIP signaling.
>
> Discussion?
>
>             jak
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> Seamoby@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby