[Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility protocols
Artur Hecker <hecker@enst.fr> Wed, 14 January 2004 14:27 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA20003 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aglys-00022s-4g for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:26:50 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0EEQoL9007858 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:26:50 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aglys-00022f-1T for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:26:50 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA20000 for <seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:26:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aglyo-0005p7-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:26:47 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aglxu-0005np-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:25:50 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aglx9-0005m9-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:25:03 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aglx9-0001xD-8G; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:25:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aglwr-0001w6-Gw for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:24:45 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA19966 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:24:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Aglwp-0005kw-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:24:43 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Aglvu-0005ja-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:23:46 -0500
Received: from infres.enst.fr ([137.194.160.3]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AglvH-0005iY-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:23:07 -0500
Received: from alceste (alceste.enst.fr [137.194.162.37]) by infres.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059A518B0 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:23:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from enst.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by alceste with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.2600.1106); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:23:03 +0100
Message-ID: <400550C6.70206@enst.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:23:02 +0100
From: Artur Hecker <hecker@enst.fr>
Organization: ENST Paris
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2004 14:23:03.0168 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB7D2000:01C3DAA9]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility protocols
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
hello seamoby! i'm sorry for my intervention. i'm currently studying the IP micromobility protocols proposed so far (Cellular IP, Hawaii, MIP-RR, EMA, IDMP, etc.) but i'm suprised to see that there hardly has been any activity in this sector since 2001: all the drafts seem to be expired, no RFCs have been published to my knowledge and there are hardly any publications on this topic anymore. so, what is the current state of the IP micromobility protocols? are all the problems considered to be more or less solved or has there been a consensus on a general change of the approach? please provide me with some information on this topic. thank a lot for your time! artur hecker ENST Paris _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
- [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility protocols Artur Hecker
- Re: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility proto… Michael Georgiades
- Re: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility proto… James Kempf
- RE: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility proto… john.loughney
- Re: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility proto… Artur Hecker
- RE: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility proto… john.loughney
- RE: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility proto… Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1