Re: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility protocols

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Wed, 14 January 2004 16:31 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26156 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:31:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Agnuu-0000gS-9X for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:30:52 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0EGUqhG002628 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:30:52 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Agnuu-0000gJ-6m for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:30:52 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26148 for <seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:30:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Agnut-00033m-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:30:51 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Agnu0-00031e-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:29:57 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Agnt8-0002zI-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:29:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Agnt6-0000aU-Po; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:29:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Agnsu-0000Zg-1t for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:28:48 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26069 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:28:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Agnst-0002xc-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:28:47 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Agnrx-0002va-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:27:49 -0500
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Agnr0-0002u7-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:26:50 -0500
Message-ID: <078c01c3dabb$43055bb0$606015ac@dclkempt40>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: Artur Hecker <hecker@enst.fr>, seamoby@ietf.org
References: <400550C6.70206@enst.fr>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility protocols
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:27:10 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

There was some work in the IRTF Micromobility Research group, but they have
been dormant for about a year. There is a new IRTF MOBility OPTmizationS
(MOBOPTS) Research Group that might be a possible venue.

In general, the work in the IP micromobility area seems to be primarily at
the research level, and there are not, to my knowledge (which may be
incomplete) any plans for near term deployment (either commercial or
experimental) or product in this area. Hence, it seems like a better problem
for IRTF.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Artur Hecker" <hecker@enst.fr>
To: <seamoby@ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 6:23 AM
Subject: [Seamoby] state of the IP micromobility protocols


> hello seamoby!
>
>
> i'm sorry for my intervention. i'm currently studying the IP
> micromobility protocols proposed so far (Cellular IP, Hawaii, MIP-RR,
> EMA, IDMP, etc.) but i'm suprised to see that there hardly has been any
> activity in this sector since 2001: all the drafts seem to be expired,
> no RFCs have been published to my knowledge and there are hardly any
> publications on this topic anymore.
>
> so, what is the current state of the IP micromobility protocols? are all
> the problems considered to be more or less solved or has there been a
> consensus on a general change of the approach?
>
> please provide me with some information on this topic.
>
> thank a lot for your time!
>
>
> artur hecker
> ENST Paris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> Seamoby@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>


_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby