[Seamoby] Advancing draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-02.txt
"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 23:41 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA23718 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA24421; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:27:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA24390 for <seamoby@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:27:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from docomolabs-usa.com (fridge.docomo-usa.com [216.98.102.228]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA23527 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:26:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from T23KEMPF (dhcp126.docomo-usa.com [172.21.96.126]) by docomolabs-usa.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id g0GNQSi25799 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <02da01c19ee4$ff49c000$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: seamoby@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:24:51 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Seamoby] Advancing draft-ietf-seamoby-ct-reqs-02.txt
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Folks,
I believe we have concluded the discussion about George's request to
remove requirements 4.12, 4.13, 4.15, and 5.5.2 from
the CT requirements draft.
My reading of opinions expressed on the list is as follows:
4.12 - Govind, Madjid keep
4.13 - A few opinions indicating indifference if it was removed
4.15 - same as 4.13
5.5.2 - Gary, Madjid strong keep
So, I think the concensus is to keep 4.12 and 5.5.2 and remove 4.13 and
4.15.
Unless there is any other comment, Gary, could you please remove the
4.13 and 4.15 and resubmit the document to the Internet Drafts
editor? When that is done, we will notify the IESG to advance
the draft.
Thanx to those who participated in the discussion and to
the rest of the WG for your patience.
jak
_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby