IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP

Rajeev Koodli <rajeev@iprg.nokia.com> Fri, 20 February 2004 19:12 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07217 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG4T-0005nP-99 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:21 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KJCLWJ022273 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:21 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG4T-0005nA-1K for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07194 for <seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG4Q-0000zv-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:12:18 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG3R-0000vy-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:17 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG3A-0000rk-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:00 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG3C-0005g2-0m; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:11:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuG2G-0005dn-Lj for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:10:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA07102 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:10:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG2E-0000qA-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:10:02 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG1H-0000mE-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:09:04 -0500
Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com ([205.226.5.69]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuG0M-0000ga-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:08:06 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id i1KJ7X807645; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:07:33 -0800
X-mProtect: <200402201907> Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection
Received: from rajeev.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.90, claiming to be "iprg.nokia.com") by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpdFbEmwH; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:07:32 PST
Message-ID: <40365AEA.7EA35957@iprg.nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:07:22 -0800
From: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev@iprg.nokia.com>
Organization: Nokia Research Center
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Raghu <dendukuri@docomolabs-usa.com>
CC: seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP
References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <024601c3f750$0902ab00$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40356445.C6D3270@iprg.nokia.com> <02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Raghu wrote:

> > (Also, note that you could not match contexts using PAR's IP
> > address since that could yield many contexts corresponding to
> > multiple MNs.)
> >
> I was also under impression that both (PAR IP & MN IP)
> from CTAR & PCTD must match before verifying the token.
> Otherwise how can nAR determine from
> which pAR a MN is comming from ?
>

Why is it necessary to know PAR's IP when the contexts
are already there ?

-Rajeev




_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email