IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Fri, 20 February 2004 22:29 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18185 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ98-000264-JB for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:23 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1KMTMYf008052 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:22 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ98-00025k-9n for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:22 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18182 for <seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ95-0000kf-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:19 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ88-0000gs-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:28:21 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ7t-0000d6-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:28:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ7p-0001i4-VY; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:28:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AuJ7A-0001Pw-Ct for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:27:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA18115 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:27:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ78-0000cD-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:27:18 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ6E-0000Yz-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:26:23 -0500
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AuJ5W-0000VD-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:25:39 -0500
Message-ID: <067d01c3f800$8a181b70$936015ac@dclkempt40>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev@iprg.nokia.com>
Cc: Raghu <dendukuri@docomolabs-usa.com>, seamoby@ietf.org, john.loughney@nokia.com
References: <059c01c3f5a4$63e9e360$936015ac@dclkempt40> <40341585.127EE1A7@iprg.nokia.com> <023601c3f744$49c01df0$1c6015ac@dcldendukuri> <40355C74.22D0A058@iprg.nokia.com> <048301c3f7d8$35128a70$936015ac@dclkempt40> <403653AB.338955A2@iprg.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] DoCoMo Implementation Issues with CTP
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:26:08 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Also I suggest that the field "Previous (New) Router IP Address"
> be revised to "Previous (New) Router IPv4 Address"
>

What happens is the router only has an IPv6 address?

How about:

    Previous (New) Router IP address, or, in the case of dual stack routers,
IPv4 address.

                jak


_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email