[Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol
Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@ccrle.nec.de> Fri, 21 December 2001 17:58 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27947 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:58:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA09840; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:46:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA09810 for <seamoby@ns.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:46:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from yamato.ccrle.nec.de (yamato.ccrle.nec.de [195.37.70.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA27672 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from wallace.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de (root@wallace [192.168.102.1]) by yamato.ccrle.nec.de (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id fBLHjqA12534 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:45:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ccrle.nec.de (zipo.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de [192.168.102.84]) by wallace.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id SAA27526 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:45:59 +0100
Message-ID: <3C237557.A8C73256@ccrle.nec.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 18:45:59 +0100
From: Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@ccrle.nec.de>
Organization: NEC Europe Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Seamoby <seamoby@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dear all, I will try to structure a draft framework, which is then for discussion on the list, taking first the protocol as it is now and moving the Mobile IPv6 options to be considered for MIP optimization purposes into the Annex (open). We have to think about extensions and address the parts the assessment draft refers to. Until first framework is available, please be referred to the current version of the base-line concept draft-renker-paging-ipv6-01.txt and also think of issues to be clarifed with respect to what is already written. So we can address these issues and have enhancements in the first draft version, which could be submitted end of January, if the WG agrees and we proceed. What do you think? I wish you all a merry Christmas and a happy new year. I will be back in the office around Jan, 10th. Marco _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
- [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol Marco Liebsch
- Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol James Kempf