Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol

Marco and Yoshi,

Great!

We have yet to hear from RajeevK on this, and Behcet still seems to have
some concerns, but in the interest of moving forward, I think you should
proceed.
If Behcet is willing to discuss his concerns, perhaps we can address
them before
you get too far into editing. I don't know where RajeevK is (he wasn't
at IETF),
but perhaps some of his co-authors could comment.

            jak

----- Original Message -----
From: "Yoshihiro Ohba" <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>
To: "Marco Liebsch" <Marco.Liebsch@ccrle.nec.de>
Cc: "Seamoby" <seamoby@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol

> I agree with Marco on the plan.
>
> Yoshihiro Ohba
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 06:45:59PM +0100, Marco Liebsch wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > I will try to structure a draft framework, which is then for
discussion
> > on the list, taking first the protocol as it is now and moving the
> > Mobile IPv6 options to be considered for MIP optimization purposes
into
> > the Annex (open). We have to think about extensions and address the
> > parts the assessment draft refers to. Until first framework is
> > available, please be referred to the current version of the
base-line
> > concept draft-renker-paging-ipv6-01.txt and also think of issues to
be
> > clarifed with respect to what is already written. So we can address
> > these issues and have enhancements in the first draft version, which
> > could be submitted end of January, if the WG agrees and we proceed.
What
> > do you think?
> >
> > I wish you all a merry Christmas and a happy new year. I will be
back in
> > the office around Jan, 10th.
> >
> > Marco
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seamoby mailing list
> Seamoby@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
>

_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby