[secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-09

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com> Mon, 28 December 2009 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960993A6882 for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:54:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eaFVn9TnMjQE for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4416F3A6884 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.26]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id nBSBsST7012289; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:54:28 +0200 (IST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:54:40 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:54:38 +0200
Thread-Topic: SecDir review of draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-09
Thread-Index: AcpoeGxYXUdrY+VLRKuuzZmGkUkAXAfO23rg
Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF89C466A@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF888AD7B@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:54:50 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document presents a conceptual framework for aggregating and composing network performance measurements in service provider networks.

I am entirely happy with the Security Considerations section, in fact I believe it is somewhat of an overkill for a document at this level of abstraction.

Thanks,
	Yaron