IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Missing secdir assignment for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?

"Franke, Daniel" <dafranke@akamai.com> Mon, 09 March 2020 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dafranke@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C4C3A079D; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFcWKwrA71ZC; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1553A0817; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 029M4ar8010962; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:10:28 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=4OSWoFDFhIdLOOYVhi3H1ix7HVq1sLVY+3QTNLndzHQ=; b=A3utNFftvmlezHb6UFs6r6pmaWi+ZQ2wq2Gomux6MCQqyz91aOIvNAcUsbol0YZWj7wb iIMikGHfZ5rLoNhQf1JOxNyQDM63Be6qxD+GJ4Z3fOIk+lhika/y01TJ9QgYC3mWIVdb lFpfUvrQiTyUTqD4lHjnI1ansDhsV/BsMLMsbfyBxRi4xUXWpj4aGx8+OSS2XdtMKE0N VxXrQQfTAh85tWUIu9aXRCexHzpVx0bO1QdAh9jYWZuTXGzPfci1ye63/LPzHs0CKvu/ CY5I0NY/LzngmJA/9keRlRqIRb/xveRiQjFYZpON0K2jHPeLyTQGEZ/dChFLl1Gy0rI6 EA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2ym4wehqsc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:10:28 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 029M2BVl027363; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 18:10:27 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.117]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2ym7u1qdp1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 18:10:27 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG3MB6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.130) by USTX2EX-DAG3MB6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:10:26 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG3MB6.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.130]) by USTX2EX-DAG3MB6.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.130]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 17:10:26 -0500
From: "Franke, Daniel" <dafranke@akamai.com>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
CC: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "sandy@tislabs.com" <sandy@tislabs.com>
Thread-Topic: Missing secdir assignment for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?
Thread-Index: AQHV9jSfcC2Y8Bb4V06FmksATtG71ahBJOcA//+tjWA=
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:10:26 +0000
Message-ID: <1583791826070.2373@akamai.com>
References: <1583773461963.52013@akamai.com>, <24166.48512.923994.774704@fireball.acr.fi>
In-Reply-To: <24166.48512.923994.774704@fireball.acr.fi>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.28.13.81]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-09_11:2020-03-09, 2020-03-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-2002050000 definitions=main-2003090133
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-09_11:2020-03-09, 2020-03-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003090133
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/704ueOt63TT-vuCiclE9XXvEqFQ>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Missing secdir assignment for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:10:38 -0000

How about we call Sandra's review the official secdir review then?
________________________________________
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Sent: Monday, March 9, 2020 18:04
To: Franke, Daniel
Cc: ntp@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Missing secdir assignment for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?

Franke, Daniel writes:
> Did draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp somehow get overlooked for
> SECDIR review? I see no review in the datatracker and nobody
> assigned to do one.

Seems to be so. I have no idea why the datatracker has not picked that
one up. It seems to have entered to last call state 2020-02-14, and I
did do assignments 2020-02-20, but for some reason that draft was not
automatically picked up by the datatracker. I have no idea why the
datatracker is not picking that document up.

And as it is for telechat agenda for Thursday this week, there is no
time to make secdir review for it on time (unless someone in the
secdir has time to do emergency review today or tomorrow...

I will make ticket
(https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/2904) about this, so
someone who can check out the logs and see if they can find out what
happened to that draft.
--
kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email