IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Missing secdir assignment for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 10 March 2020 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F03A3A08BA; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4TsMut986AZ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93A23A08B9; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 02AJ9cX4009510 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:09:43 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 12:09:38 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Cc: "Franke, Daniel" <dafranke@akamai.com>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200310190938.GH98042@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <1583773461963.52013@akamai.com> <24166.48512.923994.774704@fireball.acr.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <24166.48512.923994.774704@fireball.acr.fi>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vrzWKX6nTcXcv_FTIZftqspD-Xs>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Missing secdir assignment for draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp?
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 19:09:49 -0000

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 12:04:48AM +0200, Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Franke, Daniel writes:
> > Did draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp somehow get overlooked for
> > SECDIR review? I see no review in the datatracker and nobody
> > assigned to do one.
> 
> Seems to be so. I have no idea why the datatracker has not picked that
> one up. It seems to have entered to last call state 2020-02-14, and I
> did do assignments 2020-02-20, but for some reason that draft was not
> automatically picked up by the datatracker. I have no idea why the
> datatracker is not picking that document up.

Whatever bug happened seems likely to have affected other directorates as
well, since this doc only got a genart review and an opsdir review request,
but no secdir or other directorate review requests, and I would have
expected a couple more reviews to be requested (e.g., intdir).  Though I
don't think anyone other than secdir and genart actively tries to review
*all* drafts, so it's possible we were the only ones affected.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email