[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc4138bis-04
Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se> Mon, 08 December 2008 19:24 UTC
Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD0428C15C; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:24:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6D628C15C for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:24:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnY845JTwoSx for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E566028C14E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:24:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mB8JOI1m003179 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:24:20 -0500
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mB8JOEGF003160 for <secdir@PCH.mit.edu>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:24:14 -0500
Received: from mit.edu (W92-130-BARRACUDA-2.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.223]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id mB8JO6bt002671 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:24:07 -0500 (EST)
X-ASG-Whitelist: Barracuda Reputation
Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id BCB9C112C726 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:23:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from relay12.apple.com (relay12.apple.com [17.128.113.53]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BA749D3AC0 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:23:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay12.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay12.apple.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with ESMTP id C3B0D464002 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:23:05 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807135-a6857bb000000e1f-19-493d74197a8d
Received: from gertie.apple.com (gertie.apple.com [17.151.62.15]) by relay12.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id AE3C8420002 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:23:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nutcracker.apple.com (nutcracker.apple.com [17.202.45.101]) by ifon.apple.com (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTPSA id <0KBK001CXOIHZ100@ifon.apple.com> for secdir@mit.edu; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:23:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:23:02 -0800
From: Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se>
To: Security-Directorat Directorat <secdir@mit.edu>
Message-id: <4460B9AC-2DDF-44B5-9F2D-49F6C3564A4D@kth.se>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1037.1)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-BeenThere: secdir@mit.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
Cc: tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc4138bis-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I think those security considerations that the document should have is mentioned in the Security Considerations section. Love _______________________________________________ secdir mailing list secdir@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/secdir _______________________________________________ secdir mailing list secdir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
- [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc4138bis-04 Love Hörnquist Åstrand