Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-foudil-securitytxt-08
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 28 December 2019 18:44 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACA412011E; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:44:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lWSRJ2LpTYrs; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:44:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 924E112010C; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:44:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1ilH4h-0000PD-Qo; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 18:44:32 +0000
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:44:31 -0800
Message-ID: <m2sgl4i92o.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, Rubber Stamp <last-call@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=KkDzwXYMzWW88_OcX8GpJ92e3yrXeWR=v0SdQRYzxFQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <157720267698.19361.11750709876624228448@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAyEnSOx-MH0Ua6o9j-zMKwLktvYGXzBUw1ZkuO49BWD+1yxRQ@mail.gmail.com> <24070.38156.658126.30539@fireball.acr.fi> <760F7FE4-B10B-42FA-B3FF-0F73BEFEC953@akamai.com> <F73568E4-2AD0-4C9F-AD03-EBA831D569AB@nohats.ca> <CACsn0c=KkDzwXYMzWW88_OcX8GpJ92e3yrXeWR=v0SdQRYzxFQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Be9_SXoTZmGFeuJ5z4H6oI0ze4M>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-foudil-securitytxt-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 18:44:35 -0000
> Right now the standard is begging on twitter for a chain of > introductions. and it works, i am embarrassed to say. and one hears about outages on the ops lists before one sees the automatic outage detector reports. sitting across the hudson, i heard of the wtc attack on nanog almost two minutes before it came on television. these half-assed "the market demands something" panaceas provide false solutions we have to clean up later; emphasis on that last clause. rwhois anyone? the highway is littered with whitepages roadkill. today there is a massive problem with authority in the IRR (which some RIRs throw in with whois); and retrofitting a solution is now years in blah blah blah. no one is asking for the perfect over the good. but it is our obligation, before putting the ietf stamp on it, for it to be as good as we can reasonably get for the time. this proposal is not, as has been enumerated time and again as it has been shoved through the process over objections. imiho, tero's review stands. randy
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-foudil-… Tero Kivinen via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-fou… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-fou… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Paul Wouters
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-fou… Edwin Foudil
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Salz, Rich
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Paul Wouters
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Watson Ladd
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Randy Bush
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Salz, Rich
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Randy Bush
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Randy Bush
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Rob Sayre
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Rob Sayre
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-fou… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Salz, Rich
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Paul Wouters
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Rob Sayre