IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-foudil-securitytxt-08

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 31 December 2019 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B1D12002E; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:51:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcgZ0dXPCjyc; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5EE12008F; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1im7d2-0006RR-SJ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:51:29 +0000
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:51:28 -0800
Message-ID: <m2y2utgqbz.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20191231023707.GR35479@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <157720267698.19361.11750709876624228448@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAyEnSOx-MH0Ua6o9j-zMKwLktvYGXzBUw1ZkuO49BWD+1yxRQ@mail.gmail.com> <24070.38156.658126.30539@fireball.acr.fi> <760F7FE4-B10B-42FA-B3FF-0F73BEFEC953@akamai.com> <F73568E4-2AD0-4C9F-AD03-EBA831D569AB@nohats.ca> <CACsn0c=KkDzwXYMzWW88_OcX8GpJ92e3yrXeWR=v0SdQRYzxFQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2sgl4i92o.wl-randy@psg.com> <20191229033101.GE35479@kduck.mit.edu> <m2lfqvitcz.wl-randy@psg.com> <20191231023707.GR35479@kduck.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/hSF2CKJdmDLH4Lr0SrAoUPu94zY>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-foudil-securitytxt-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 02:51:32 -0000

> Well, I do remember some objections raised when this draft was still at
> SAAG/SECDISPATCH, but I also assigned it a document shepherd and refused to
> touch it myself until the shepherd had worked with the authors to address
> those comments to the extent that we understood them.  (That was mostly
> comments from Paul Wouters, if I remember correctly; there may have been
> others.)  So I'm not sure which objections you think have been ignored
> while "the draft marched on"

e.g. mine.  qed.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email