Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13

Yes, thanks Joe!  I put a Discuss ballot in for a
non-directly-security-related issue: I had a question about whether this
document had text that was attempting to impose requirements on parties
that do not implement this document.

-Ben

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:33:59PM +0000, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi Joe, thank you for this review.  I entered a No Objection ballot.
> 
> Regards,
> Roman
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: secdir <secdir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joseph Salowey via
> > Datatracker
> > Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 12:58 AM
> > To: secdir@ietf.org
> > Cc: last-call@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org
> > Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13
> > 
> > Reviewer: Joseph Salowey
> > Review result: Ready
> > 
> > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
> > Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
> > other last call comments.
> > 
> > The summary of the review is ready from a security perspective.  The security
> > considerations section is adequate.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > secdir mailing list
> > secdir@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> > wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview