Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12

Yes, thanks Rich.

Interestingly, though my Discuss on the corresponding OSPF document was in
a portion that is fairly OSPF-specific, there was a similar thing in the
IS-IS document that also got a Discuss from me.

-Ben

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:06:50PM +0000, Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi Rich, thank you for this review.  I entered a No Objection ballot.
> 
> Regards,
> Roman
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: secdir <secdir-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rich Salz 
> > via Datatracker
> > Sent: Thu, 30 April 2020 18:06 UTC
> > To: secdir@ietf.org
> > Cc: last-call@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org
> > Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12
> >
> > Reviewer: Rich Salz
> > Review result: Ready
> > 
> > I am the SECDIR reviewer for this document; the security directorate tries to
> > review all documents before they go to the IESG. This content is intended
> > primarily for the SecAD's, anyone else should consider this like other
> > last-call comments.
> >
> > This document is READY.
> >
> > This is a short doument. It defines a way for MPLS routers to indicate that
> > they can handle additional meta-data, "entropy labels" and depth of them, to do
> > traffic routing.
> >
> > The security implications of this are well-discussed.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview