IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 10 September 2013 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C438B21F9FB7; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.394
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.394 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_RECV_IP_211216=0.978, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UYYI-VMjmkAc; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EF321F9F80; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q10so6986761pdj.20 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=MkczKop9wc7f4XX6RZqECYghcOWkP+nLVSQY62WlVsA=; b=StW3FTd/+FkILihQRQzNvpNn2sYt0OJwaBD1Mv5WTHk0D8OtUomQj00iZh/ggF9fGY iaHO0KM2ji++/U/duIG5R30kHk8L1G2OzkotocYZ9xFtixEU081b4MSJVBE0ww8nS4le bl0shI/qDNxtWkbSgjg91nJLW85JaK5sG65nI+hf/uh4gEvtngrjloK0Sc57TNsDqUUL +QLF9qRRGbn68dyWHdLCl0h9G43jzC8epCfYkXQ8Rzp5aZdmqk05bBK2wIcXAz3/rddC LomsqSTD1HTbsCcVXNV7q6z8BrnwNU0PE6dq35uieqjGv4pMvDHWHyi5J0lBvL1N4ING DJZw==
X-Received: by 10.66.136.227 with SMTP id qd3mr11839630pab.113.1378783344961; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.8.117] ([211.219.0.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iu7sm19651456pbc.45.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE53ED6D.1CBD%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 06:22:19 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8D9934B4-948F-47A5-AB5E-02DEDD5277F0@gmail.com>
References: <CE53ED6D.1CBD%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
To: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs.all@tools.ietf.org, "lionel.morand@orange.com Morand" <lionel.morand@orange.com>, iesg@ietf.org, "bclaise@cisco.com Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com>, Eric McMurry <emcmurry@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-overload-reqs-11
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 03:22:26 -0000

Folks,

So if I got it right, the last sentence of the Req13 will be removed and
the Req31 stays as it is now.

This would be fine with me.

- JOuni

On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:27 AM, Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> wrote:

>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The intent was that the overload condition has granularity. That is, the
>> overloaded node indicates an overload condition with some granularity,
>> and later ends it. The act of ending doesn't change the granularity. We
>> don't have an explicit requirement to be able to change the granularity
>> of an existing condition. (Although we do not prevent a solution from
>> offering that ability--but I suspect if the solution did that, it would
>> involve multiple concurrent overload conditions, or ending one condition
>> and starting another.)
> 
> Got it.  Thanks.  
> 
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status