Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-trill-cmt-08

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 06 October 2015 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3CE1B363A; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 348-LXoe9odk; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF381B363B; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obcgx8 with SMTP id gx8so143900078obc.3; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0SEClJswM4X/Z6WTY9a56wQyrhopE38q6+sycafY9r8=; b=Wae/2qtimmXyztYxHamRxCQk0WWw3j7l3EYa3P4hU6/yD7pvUBoxPsBs8Wb6vZQ+ZM ammuFhpX3TLoxOasfu/T9QYxwO19Q4wLGGlpvuXxWoYxoyWUQdaD57WyDdZVZFA+Owxs D0Imj8IpdVOJSNSfNqR1OxGTs0lbPSk8TayGE6303wRfQzFSkE13HQdCKd8m3H8hfIUQ pw6mVQ/1ImCWRgwVG9ZU68so2Eu3DlH3cmaDelNtg3okBaUQ6R4yk3QuO02jSavFEseO 3Pjg0JGikeoXPuiDn6mSqVgehI/UuSBBTEgmPX9jpDWM0roKoFPfHX2+JvmqALR4rAWW 1j4w==
X-Received: by 10.182.96.168 with SMTP id dt8mr18883555obb.36.1444099580693; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.144.65 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BAY167-W929F58EBAB4A89F350CE25DF370@phx.gbl>
References: <BAY167-W929F58EBAB4A89F350CE25DF370@phx.gbl>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:46:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEE95oG6u8OH66=51CnHEjT7=ff6jc3P4FmBV-CThhy4Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Charlie Kaufman <charliekaufman@outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e489a871344052166a236"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/GzW5TAxuTQNno1EiY9K4_Rky8-s>
Cc: "draft-ietf-trill-cmt.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-trill-cmt.all@tools.ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-trill-cmt-08
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 02:46:22 -0000

Hi Charlie,

Thanks for the review. You suggested editorials all look reasonable to me.

Donald
=============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Charlie Kaufman <charliekaufman@outlook.com>
wrote:

> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
>
> This document specifies an optional new mechanism for trill that supports
> more fine-grained control of the load balancing of multi-cast packets. The
> changes are to the routing protocol and does not make it any more security
> sensitive than it already is and hence introduces no new security issues.
>
>
> Typos:
>
>
> Page 3, Section 1, para 2, line 3: "[RFC6439], provide" -> "[RFC6439]
> provides"
>
> Page 5, Section 1.2, line 1: "of much passionate" -> "of many passionate"
> or "of very passionate"
>
> Page 14, Section 6, Para 2, line 1: "involve with" -> "involved with"
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>