[secdir] secdir review: draft-daboo-et-al-icalendar-in-xml

Love Hörnquist Åstrand <lha@kth.se> Thu, 19 May 2011 05:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lha@kth.se>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12562E06F6; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.949
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HGISTgLyCDUO; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se (smtp-1.sys.kth.se []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF88FE06D1; Wed, 18 May 2011 22:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se []) by smtp-1.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03A5156B42; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se
Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se ([]) by mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id T+KtXCbnGEZz; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EXHUB1.ug.kth.se (exhub1.ug.kth.se []) by smtp-1.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456411551FC; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:11:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EXDB1.ug.kth.se ([]) by EXHUB1.ug.kth.se ([]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:11:46 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Love_H=F6rnquist_=C5strand?= <lha@kth.se>
To: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Security-Directorat Directorat <secdir@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: secdir review: draft-daboo-et-al-icalendar-in-xml
Thread-Index: AQHMFeM/aMgPriRT30a0VKLBVTS49Q==
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 05:11:45 +0000
Message-ID: <1F0345B0-0507-4D5D-97D7-9002CC198A44@kth.se>
Accept-Language: sv-SE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-26-1057190162"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-daboo-et-al-icalendar-in-xml.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-daboo-et-al-icalendar-in-xml.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [secdir] secdir review: draft-daboo-et-al-icalendar-in-xml
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 05:12:23 -0000

Hello all,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

I find the document be have appropriate security consideration section
and have no additional comment.

The document should have the same properties as existing documents
documenting ical and xml and should from a security perspective not be so scary.