[secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-13

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Thu, 19 May 2011 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6127E06B8 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DAAu7Iq-wpM4 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7E6E069C for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 May 2011 09:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dommiel.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:49189 helo=[207.248.65.214]) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1QN6BZ-0001oL-11 for secdir@ietf.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:34:53 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240804c9fadd5a1114@[207.248.65.214]>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:58:06 -0400
To: secdir@ietf.org
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Subject: [secdir] SECDIR review of draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-13
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:34:56 -0000

I previously reviewed and earlier version of this document, and 
raised a few concerns that dealt with the structure of the secruity 
considerations section, as well as a few questions about technical 
security details. Mary Barnes replied
to my comments (in March). I am satisfied that her replies, and the 
changes that have been made to create version 13 of this doc, address 
all of my comments.

Steve