[secdir] Sec-dir review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0909C1296ED for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:21:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBMB5-5sZe2W for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp66.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp66.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA43D127076 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 13:21:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 19D4720F85; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:20:58 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp25.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id E197B2553E; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:20:47 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [10.20.30.43] (pool-71-191-33-181.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.191.33.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:20:58 -0500
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0F5E25F9-5D7B-4BF4-863A-F4CBE8A2ADBD"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Message-Id: <F719D7A1-874A-417A-B088-1E029ACF5921@ogud.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:20:47 -0500
To: draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload.all@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/IedXEL1DaDvT3u930RVYX_tz_dc>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Sec-dir review of draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 21:21:02 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

Draft is: Ready 

Well written, all security related points were addressed in Security considerations of this draft or RFC7683

Olafur