Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-temporal-hitless-psm-12.txt

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for your review, Tero!  This is helpful and I agree on the title.

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Tero Kivinen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
> security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
> these comments just like any other last call comments.
>
> This document seems to be problem statement and requirements document
> for new MPLS path segment monitoring tool. The title does not really
> reflect to that and from there it would look more like that this would
> define that actul hitless path segment monitoring mechanism. As this
> only provides problem statement and requiremens for it, the title
> should be changed to say so.
>
> The security considerations section just refers to rfc5921 and 5860.
> As this is problem statement and requirements document, I do not think
> there is real security considerations in this document, the protocol
> document based on this might then have more considerations.
>
> Nits: The OAM term in the document should be expanded both in the
> abstract and in the first use.
>
> Summary: Ready with nits.
> --
> [e-mail]
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen