Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-lisp-mib

Uri Blumenthal <uri@MIT.EDU> Fri, 21 June 2013 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <uri@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1BD21F90CD; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 04:16:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tUj9-fy+ATVo; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 04:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu [18.7.68.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D360C21F9079; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 04:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074424-b7f228e00000096b-85-51c43608ec80
Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id A3.73.02411.80634C15; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:16:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r5LBGMZU003850; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:16:23 -0400
Received: from [192.168.11.118] ([12.15.254.140]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as uri@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r5LBGJ8F032194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 07:16:21 -0400
References: <090501ce6e01$4779cb70$d66d6250$@olddog.co.uk> <ED495B2B0CBE86418E03429D7AC236C40FD8362A@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <ED495B2B0CBE86418E03429D7AC236C40FD8362A@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D0EC773D-1CBC-4D5F-BFCA-875426246E59@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329)
From: Uri Blumenthal <uri@MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 06:16:20 -0500
To: "Gregg Schudel (gschudel)" <gschudel@cisco.com>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrOKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6nosthdiTQ4PgmPYsfPTeYLTZ0zmG1 uDjnBLvFjD8TmS0+LHzIYnH42GUmBzaPKb83snosWfKTyeP2jT/sHis2r2T0+HL5M1sAaxSX TUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxpHGtUwFk/kq7v/bzdjAOI27i5GTQ0LARGLdpvPsELaYxIV769m6GLk4 hAT2MUrcXHMMytnIKPHtyyIoZxGTxOULzawgLUIC1RLd67YzdjFycPAKiEtcPegDEuYU8JU4 s3I5I4jNLGAg8WLtRDYIW1ti2cLXzCA2r4CVREvzcxaQmcwCbUwS+x5uYoQ4Q0Zi8/bHYCex CShJNDdvAdslDNTQu+kEE4jNIqAqcfXxVLChIgLGEhOW/2GbwCg4C+GMWUhWz0KyegEj8ypG 2ZTcKt3cxMyc4tRk3eLkxLy81CJdc73czBK91JTSTYzgOHBR2cHYfEjpEKMAB6MSD2+A0uFA IdbEsuLK3EOMkhxMSqK8X0yOBArxJeWnVGYkFmfEF5XmpBYfYpTgYFYS4Q2+A1TOm5JYWZVa lA+TkuZgURLnFbu1M1BIID2xJDU7NbUgtQgmK8PBoSTBux9kqGBRanpqRVpmTglCmomDE2Q4 D9DwNyA1vMUFibnFmekQ+VOMuhzznmx9zyjEkpeflyolznsEpEgApCijNA9uDix9vWIUB3pL mPcVSBUPMPXBTXoFtIQJaMme1YdAlpQkIqSkGhgb/n7JjzRz2MFbbLaux9DSkum+o7NOr+XO qk/b21g2yn8KCW2ZwbVwzUT2mBdsYtd9Zt6ZLBq06udiwS9WvbI8l5gcP/sVcm3w3nR1l7DO /wO7G8Kbb7++wpSs8/JTff59rQs7shsk7L+Fu8ly7Pg5a8bXN0uebpDdnHi3pD+rbOovNaM7 O0SVWIozEg21mIuKEwEwujAyOgMAAA==
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-lisp-mib.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-lisp-mib.all@tools.ietf.org>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-lisp-mib
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:16:31 -0000

So what's the problem making these writable under SNMPv3 protection (and stating this requirement)?


Sent from my iPad

On Jun 20, 2013, at 18:35, "Gregg Schudel (gschudel)" <gschudel@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> although...
>> 
>>     lispMIBTuningParametersGroup OBJECT-GROUP
>>         OBJECTS { lispFeaturesMapCacheLimit,
>>                   lispFeaturesEtrMapCacheTtl
>>                 }
>>         STATUS  current
>>         DESCRIPTION
>>                 "A collection of writeable objects used to
>>                  configure LISP behavior and to tune performance."
>>         ::= { lispGroups 10 }
>> 
>> ...might lead one to think that something here is writeable.
>> 
>> Adrian
> 
> 
> thanks all
> 
> i'll re-word this in the final - it shouldnt have said that.
> (about writable objects)
> 
> thanks for pointing it out
> (it's amazing how carefully these have been read and yet small
> details slip through… ;(
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Gregg
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> .:|:.:|:. | gregg schudel (ccie#9591) LISP technical marketing engr
>  cisco   | mobile: +1 571 332 2222   email: gschudel@cisco.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> cisco corporate legal statement: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview