IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g719-04, RTP Payload format for G.719

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 10 December 2008 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <secdir-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secdir-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3272F28C17E; Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:24:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EF43A695F for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:07:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.215, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t0sei+0-bcFO for <secdir@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (PCH.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.90]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE95B3A6889 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pch.mit.edu (pch.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mB9K7QlS023963 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:07:26 -0500
Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83]) by pch.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id mB9K7Opw023957 for <secdir@PCH.mit.edu>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:07:24 -0500
Received: from mit.edu (W92-130-BARRACUDA-2.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.223]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.9.2) with ESMTP id mB9K7I5F013546 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:07:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.189]) by mit.edu (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E484411393A9 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:06:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z22so69788fkz.6 for <secdir@mit.edu>; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:06:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language :message-id; bh=APOogYzYMePmfh/9A2gTHxaLFHOqLOgVgtT+J33xUHQ=; b=VLpw3456PAkeE3jV+SndWHyKruMkFy7YidnjhjL3kgt0DZ4ETsBswfR3o7pDtkdDp7 h1l580aY61Uwn1X5FIVhG+lRmbMzhZH/X1izBByHX5N2x6VT3mzYQYk7mtoo2wLLUihh CE3Nn4PKPvE7pzLYLeHAEmFP6i82CrOhfLTmI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language:message-id; b=qPUTln4YprnFv8g4Tc/V+nvnza7RySno03egSpc7UDUzJ2aaHvqnbLac+BS2VgCkFM j6se+IkFkdRlNwdy2Nj48q8aN0nrWt0gBdAjzqJBrRmubm1+zvQrc9RsCemQHyNTEgjq F8LX4Cxiq9Gmooger5eJ+c31Tzi1RABshNMls=
Received: by 10.103.117.8 with SMTP id u8mr208420mum.123.1228853216976; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:06:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from windows8d787f9 (bzq-79-179-158-180.red.bezeqint.net [79.179.158.180]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j2sm409723mue.5.2008.12.09.12.06.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 09 Dec 2008 12:06:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Cullen Jennings' <fluffy@cisco.com>, 'Russ Housley' <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <200812080137.mB81bm2G027217@localhost.localdomain> <493CE19D.3020107@ericsson.com> <20081208172732.8EAED500003@mailgw2.ericsson.se> <493E3657.1020204@ericsson.com> <200812091526.mB9FQ7oG009911@sj-core-2.cisco.com> <8F7CB34E-C6C1-4A07-B34F-CCB0909036A7@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8F7CB34E-C6C1-4A07-B34F-CCB0909036A7@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:06:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AclaMs/s2xk7UFmnSbiBbEw95s58CAABobAQ
Content-Language: en-us
Message-ID: <493ecfdf.02a1660a.74b2.ffffc782@mx.google.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42
X-BeenThere: secdir@mit.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
Precedence: list
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:24:17 -0800
Cc: 'Magnus Westerlund' <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, secdir@mit.edu, ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, csp@csperkins.org, avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g719-04, RTP Payload format for G.719
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: secdir-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: secdir-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,
Personally I prefer 5 since it make it easier to payload specification
writers. You can have 3 as part of 5 if you put the information in
draft-ietf-avt-rtp-howto 
Roni Even

-----Original Message-----
From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 9:17 PM
To: Russ Housley
Cc: Magnus Westerlund; Hilarie Orman; ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com;
secdir@mit.edu; iesg@ietf.org; jon.peterson@neustar.biz; csp@csperkins.org;
avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] draft-ietf-avt-rtp-g719-04, RTP Payload format for
G.719


On Dec 9, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Russ Housley wrote:

>  I do not know what others think, but either 3 or 5 would work for me.

Both of theses would work for me. 

_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/secdir
_______________________________________________
secdir mailing list
secdir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email