Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Sun, 10 April 2016 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69AC12D096 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mEdK_s_VE3Bk for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B18412B03D for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c6so124399485qga.1 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=77Mus8RfAkLENS88V+IVdzrxd/kyM9+nv5sD22behEA=; b=X0GtnjLn4Qv7G8as68S2C01gTuHPgehZNhgPUDY5nQ5DXp7AxrM4TPz7omMZJKH/Y/ 8nIFvkstvSWxqC73gjd/xQVxBPXphzkKtR8fNctPN14OQOJVUPTIzkDhm4bwur7d2gOE N5CKSNH0bCLjyMKLYhA83iMkU2KqNXYJYjQzA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=77Mus8RfAkLENS88V+IVdzrxd/kyM9+nv5sD22behEA=; b=WQbZQCgjv68N2VGelklY9F0oGylqAGljIfk7sNv46cDuWSvr92iXl4df4VI53WkWy5 tItquuH8nPQSX3/UKcRSFa54cDFH5qvfdR62svnLUgiEIMr6ZO8srP/8xxNmB/c0rzZ6 XrGc2Ao67Uy1oX6hyS/LXC0cGzEy+EVEloaVSUCeg+c/O+vDQxhLEHg96jrYJdOj+vgT ROTklPnP5OROmfYamyoeYZfqqce/IWSnFWDGQBHe59+U4iJdV3NmTOl9dxb9JGqiSy9o PbtP8BJRoVuFBERTH+gnJ+IFuiRccZDJhHg6Hap5Ydq553Yb36WGlzBTPmANQOynmPs5 wfvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLYcDmg2twn3PM1TDtz3swOPKGIHYhG6fwgurrHLVa+qaxkpM1r92R235ruSPV+2g==
X-Received: by 10.140.28.117 with SMTP id 108mr21984851qgy.40.1460289252624; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:8934:95dd:bb20:272c? ([2001:67c:370:176:8934:95dd:bb20:272c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l126sm9099945qhb.30.2016.04.10.04.54.10 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <bfbe20ee1196a22eadd854ce7090ffc7@nestor.otaverkko.fi>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 08:54:08 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A372E02-DC5C-4791-91D8-20D4949D6383@sn3rd.com>
References: <F3AF3182-F31A-4EF8-8DC5-54B27B6ADC05@sn3rd.com> <bfbe20ee1196a22eadd854ce7090ffc7@nestor.otaverkko.fi>
To: Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/WMvih77sMbsG5FlDF2xn6OG3HMM>
Cc: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis.all@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 11:54:16 -0000

Thanks for the reminder:

> On Feb 12, 2016, at 08:47, Samu Varjonen <samu.varjonen@hiit.fi> wrote:
>> Nits:
>> 
>> nit 1: I read this a couple of times:
>>  CERT parameters with the same Cert group number
>>  in the group field indicate a logical grouping.
>> Isn’t it that the same group # is in the Cert group field:?
>>  CERT parameters with the same number
>>  in the Cert group field indicate a logical grouping.
> 
> Is this about missing CERT word in the group field? Or did I misunderstand this question?

Yeah this is completely editorial; I think “Cert” is just in the wrong place.  Might be wrong.

spt