Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-19
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Mon, 09 July 2012 08:58 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0871521F8803; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVAx79LXa4hG; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from donbot.greenbytes.de (mail.greenbytes.de [217.91.35.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5821021F8802; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.36] (unknown [93.217.121.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by donbot.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45E05C4C0ED; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:59:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FFA9D54.1050900@greenbytes.de>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:59:00 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Organization: greenbytes GmbH
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <4F955E48.7060908@cisco.com> <F76C6CF1-F6B8-429F-A57F-D2B4794EFE93@mnot.net> <DB34634F-A783-4B18-A9CA-C0D571A717F4@cisco.com> <DE72BACC-BF0E-448F-A8E2-DA02F162FC10@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <DE72BACC-BF0E-448F-A8E2-DA02F162FC10@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional.all@tools.ietf.org, Klaas Wierenga <klaas@cisco.com>, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-19
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:58:48 -0000
On 2012-07-09 02:52, Mark Nottingham wrote: > ... >> "If condition B applies you MUST do A, if condition B does NOT apply you MUST NOT do A" > > > OK, I'll pass that on to the editors. > ... That would be a normative change; right now we don't make any requirement for the case where condition B is not met. Best regards, Julian
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-c… Klaas Wierenga
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-… Klaas Wierenga
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-httpbis-… Julian Reschke