Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08.txt
"Derek Atkins" <derek@ihtfp.com> Fri, 24 April 2015 21:14 UTC
Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225BC1AC3DF; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0aHZ_LPCrnIW; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (mail2.ihtfp.org [IPv6:2001:4830:143:1::3a11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47AF81AC3FB; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BA7E2035; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09238-07; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:14:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 543C3E2039; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:14:00 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1429910040; bh=hAeyACYDPkXyAoBEHuST/TdTWTm38pZKMQFEVTUsy6s=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=iiUGQRiTyrPQ92/LWGog28uuqkwo/AmlSTPaGVKkXesJ1lEeCWlZ3V3KlfgkkP4WB +LZbdwS0sl9xyDOJycSoZZ50p5qZJaukTiByyvjv1wzcT1OLqvS+kbVgngs2tnOE1U AeNLRz2/fhLo9V+cX7sSsHXpjaVjP1Cln8THKmgA=
Received: from 192.168.248.204 (SquirrelMail authenticated user warlord) by mail2.ihtfp.org with HTTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:14:00 -0400
Message-ID: <2b6316e8516bd91b36431852b02c93c1.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org>
In-Reply-To: <11BD1537-EFC6-4F71-9160-9BFAC0F38FAE@nostrum.com>
References: <sjmegn95jj3.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <11BD1537-EFC6-4F71-9160-9BFAC0F38FAE@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:14:00 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-14.fc20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_MKXM9Ov4spRul7lZKjCzNG3mls>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, peter@andyet.com, iesg@ietf.org, precis-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus-08.txt
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:14:13 -0000
GRR... Cut-and-paste error. Yes, this was my review of draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15.txt I'll resend with the correct subject. Mea Culpa -derek On Fri, April 24, 2015 5:04 pm, Ben Campbell wrote: > Hi Derek, > > The subject mentions draft-ietf-payload-rtp-opus. I gather from the > content, this was actually about saslprepbis? > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > > On 24 Apr 2015, at 16:00, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's >> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the >> IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving >> security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts. Comments >> not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the >> IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these >> comments just like any other last call comments. >> >> Summary: >> >> Ready to publish >> >> Details: >> >> I'm not a SASLprep guru, so I haven't verified all the examples or >> comparisons, but security wise I see no issues with this document. >> >> I have no other comments on this document. >> >> -derek >> -- >> Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 >> derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com >> Computer and Internet Security Consultant > -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp… Derek Atkins
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload… Ben Campbell
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-payload… Derek Atkins