Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-04

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2011 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB38821F8B23; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGT872MlGu2A; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D2021F8B21; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so2211894qyk.10 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EOV8LFi/nfjR+xjWdwhXUc/YaQOPvM9wFXH42dW4rU0=; b=IouGYuXw4V8x/QpouHORmYDiw5AnvSui03F6n/k7uvYGDersmG09ENVF2cMNKWdZW9 SA6VE6QrAIsf3WC/YyGPHkqt+8Fmgio63s0emT1PeXrj2MYCZ6mIME1Jy0bu+YW35TIe bPcXD+v/1O9AXWd5xWW3HVhV3sEnS9+QOb5/k=
Received: by 10.224.184.3 with SMTP id ci3mr2608929qab.185.1314709994563; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-124-120-231-171.revip2.asianet.co.th. [124.120.231.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gj8sm9952113qab.3.2011.08.30.06.13.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 06:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E5CE1DD.90607@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:13:01 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stbryant@cisco.com
References: <4E5A36CC.6070506@gmail.com> <4E5BE0FD.2070704@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E5BE0FD.2070704@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: daniel@olddog.co.uk, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, pwe3-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, adrian@olddog.co.uk, hongyu.lihongyu@huawei.com, robin@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-li-pwe3-ms-pw-pon-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:11:48 -0000

On 8/30/2011 1:57 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> Hi Glen,
> 
> "just out of curiosity, why is this not a pwe3 WG document?"
> 
> The PWE3 WG considered that a PW running over a layer that
> the IETF was not responsible for was out of their scope.

Thanks for satisfying my curiosity!

...