Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21
Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Thu, 05 January 2017 19:20 UTC
Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3192C12962A; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:20:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <gkM3R9x1mMwn>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gkM3R9x1mMwn; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C30812961F; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:20:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.202.67] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:19:25 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240607d4944caaa33c@[192.168.202.67]>
In-Reply-To: <879E76B64CF340468BF5E4DE504C2242C1364E@szxemi502-mbx.china.huawei.com >
References: <879E76B64CF340468BF5E4DE504C2242C1364E@szxemi502-mbx.china.huawei.com >
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:20:09 -0800
To: zhangdacheng <dacheng.zhang@huawei.com>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/ePVZHVr5GjcoBY3YFcQaElPEbsw>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall.all@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-21
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:20:17 -0000
At 3:42 AM +0000 1/5/17, zhangdacheng wrote: > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the > security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should > treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > > The security considerations cites multiple RFCs. In those RFCs, the > security issues related with this work are extensively discussed, > although I have to look up those RFCs to find out how to deal with, > for example, DDoS attacks. > > I think it would really helpful if authors can briefly introduce > what issues are discuss in those RFCs. Apart from this, this > document is ready for publication. Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. I added some text to mention the issues covered by RFC 5069, which I took to be the focus of your suggestion. --Randy -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- If you can't annoy somebody there's little point in writing --Kingsley Amis
- [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ecall-… zhangdacheng
- Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-ecrit-ec… Randall Gellens