Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-09
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sun, 14 June 2020 05:06 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AE13A0A8E for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PtADjC6fjgKB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DEC43A0A88 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 05E56cbd026522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 01:06:40 -0400
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:06:38 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200614050638.GI11992@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <sjm36728ul4.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <sjm36728ul4.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/kmyTOJ_t8jbXiZXKPKTJhQa_yxs>
Subject: Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 05:06:44 -0000
Thanks Derek, we appreciate having the extra set of expert eyes. Roman put a Discuss in about making sure the data structure names we use are consistent/correct, and I had one that's being picky about the Internet Standard criteria and whether one feature qualifies for it. -Ben On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:44:07PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Hi, > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving > security requirements and considerations in IETF drafts. Comments > not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the > IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these > comments just like any other last call comments. > > Summary: > > * Ready to publish > > Details: > > * Just as a point of information, if I recall correctly I was also > present when this topic was first discussed ;) > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 > derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com > Computer and Internet Security Consultant >
- [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rfc815… Derek Atkins
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rf… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rf… Derek Atkins
- Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rf… Benjamin Kaduk